Tag Archives: Transvaginal

C.R. Bards Transvaginal Mesh Devices Allegedly Utilize Plastic not Appropriate for Human Implantation, Notes Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 26, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm devoted to guarding the rights of victims injured by defective health-related devices, is reporting that C.R. Bard Inc., the subject of one of 5 transvaginal mesh-associated multidistrict litigations (MDL) consolidated in West Virginia, is alleged to have employed a resin-primarily based plastic said to be unsuitable for human implantation in its mesh devices, according to court records. A June 26 Bloomberg report noted that this info will be utilized in the upcoming July eight trial in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Cisson v. C.R. Bard Inc., Case No. two:11-cv-00195), exactly where it is 1 of numerous instances pending in the MDL named In Re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Method Products Liability Litigation (MDL No 2187).

&#13

Bard managers employed a resin-primarily based plastic made by a unit of Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. to make healthcare mesh devices even soon after the supplier of the material warned that the plastic need to not be permanently implanted inside folks, according to emails and documents in the lawsuit more than Bards mesh implants. Lawyers for the thousands of females who filed lawsuits as component of the MDL against C.R. Bard, faulting its Avaulta line of transvaginal implants for their injuries, mentioned that court files show that not only did business officials know that the resin-based plastic utilised in the mesh wasnt fit for human implantation they also attempted to cover up their use of it, according to the Bloomberg report.

&#13

According to Bloomberg, U.S. District Judge Goodwin ruled that the e mail correspondence relating to the resin-based mesh raised a genuine concern of material fact about whether Bard was conscious its conduct was practically specific to trigger injuries. Goodwin will oversee 20,000 lawsuits now pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Aside from C.R. Bard, the other MDLs are: In Re: Boston Scientific Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2326 In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327 In Re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Assistance Systems Goods Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2387 and In Re: American Healthcare Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Goods Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325).

&#13

When again we are faced with the possibility that a firm is a lot more concerned with the bottom line than the overall health and wellness of the individuals getting implanted with their merchandise, said Gary P. Falkowitz, a Managing Lawyer at Parker Waichman LLP. Businesses that make health-related devices ought to be extra vigilant about the supplies they use.

&#13

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), transvaginal mesh devices had been authorized to treat tension urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), circumstances most typically triggered by weakened pelvic muscles. Transvaginal mesh devices are supposed to support right these circumstances by offering added strength to the pelvic walls. The FDA also reports that the most typical complications associated with transvaginal mesh may contain:

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Federal Judge Overseeing American Healthcare Systems Surgical Mesh Lawsuits Selects Bellwether Instances, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 02, 2013

Transvaginal mesh lawsuit claims involving items manufactured by American Medical Systems, Inc. continue to move forward in a federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on July 1, 2013, four surgical mesh lawsuits have been chosen for the litigations bellwether trials. The proceedings initial trial is scheduled to start on December 3, 2013, even though a second is slated to start off on Might six, 2014. U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin will soon establish which of the 4 bellwether instances will go to trial on those dates, according to the Order. (In Re: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2325)

&#13

We are incredibly pleased to see these claims moving forward. The bellwether trials will give important clues into how other juries may possibly weigh claims in similar surgical mesh lawsuits involving American Medical Systems, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firms vaginal mesh lawyers are currently representing hundreds of girls who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, discomfort, scarring, infection and other serious injuries, allegedly due to transvaginal mesh merchandise marketed by American Health-related Systems and other manufacturers. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in the American Healthcare Systems litigation.

&#13

American Health-related Systems Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

&#13

Court documents indicate that a lot more than 7,700 surgical mesh lawsuits have been filed against American Healthcare Systems in the Southern District of West Virginia. All of the lawsuits pending in the litigation allege that American Healthcare Systems failed to provide adequate warnings with regards to the dangers linked with surgical mesh utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. It is additional alleged that plaintiffs suffered a range of serious complications due to the defective nature of these items, including chronic infections, organ harm, and mesh erosion and shrinkage.

&#13

The litigation surrounding transvaginal mesh devices utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence has been expanding given that October 2008, when the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) warned the public that it had received a lot more than 1,000 reports of serious complications linked with vaginal mesh products over a 3 year period.* Less than 3 years later, in July 2011, the FDA warned that complaints related with transvaginal prolapse repair had grown 5-fold because the 2008 alert, and stated that it no longer regarded as these varieties of injuries to be uncommon.**

&#13

American Healthcare Systems is just 1 of many producers involved in litigations for surgical mesh lawsuits established in the Southern District of West Virginia. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is also serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees for proceedings involving Boston Scientific Corp., (MDL No. 2326) C.R. Bard, Inc., (MDL No. 2187), and In re: Ethicon, Inc. (MDL No. 2327). Court documents show that the very first of the litigations bellwether trials, involving a C.R. Bard product, is scheduled to start on July 8, 2013.

&#13

Mr. Grand has also been named Co-Liaison Counsel in two consolidated litigations established for C.R. Bard and Ethicon transvaginal mesh lawsuits that are at present underway in New Jerseys Atlantic County Superior Court. He was also a member of the trial group on the very first Ethicon trial in that proceeding, which ended in March with an $ 11 million verdict for the Plaintiff. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten)

&#13

Ladies who have allegedly suffered severe complications related with transvaginal mesh may possibly be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of data with regards to transvaginal mesh lawsuits is obtainable at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To arrange for a free of charge legal consultation with an experienced mesh lawyer, please get in touch with the Firm these days by calling 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm&#13

**fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Security/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective healthcare devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the best plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Marketing.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits Improve as Statute of Limitations Approaches, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP

Posted on by


(PRWEB) July 02, 2013

A two-year bar for making claims approaches this month for transvaginal mesh lawsuits in some states, which has led far more men and women recently to file lawsuits with the aid of attorneys such as the Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a vaginal mesh law firm. There are presently about 16,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits in federal courts, according to court records.

&#13

On July 13, 2013, it will have been two years since the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration issued a drug safety communication* indicating that the dangers of transvaginal mesh, used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and anxiety urinary incontinence, are not uncommon. Though states statutes of limitation for claims might differ, several states set the limit to two years following an FDA alert, according to court documents in pelvic repair system liability litigations in the consolidation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (MDLs 2440, 2187, 2325, 2326, 2327 and 2387).

&#13

These limits are quite crucial. Those who think their mesh implant has harmed them must speak to a lawyer about the applicable statute of limitations for claims, said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. Very carefully contemplating regardless of whether or not to file a lawsuit to recover compensation is a need to, but waiting as well extended could mean losing any opportunity at that compensation.

&#13

Recently, lawsuits against Cook Healthcare, Inc., joined those against C.R. Bard, American Health-related Systems, Boston Scientific, Ethicon and Coloplast in a federal consolidation of lawsuits for pretrial efficiency, according to court documents.

&#13

On July 1, the federal court chose four separate surgical mesh lawsuits as bellwether trials in the AMS MDL. The very first trial is set for Dec. three. Plaintiffs in the six MDLs allege that their mesh implants have brought on them to endure adverse side effects, including erosion, bleeding, pain and infection, according to the court documents.

&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages these who are interested in a lot more details to visit its transvaginal mesh FAQ web page.

&#13

*http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm

&#13

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-primarily based firm that represents consumers nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has far more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent clientele hurt by defective health-related devices and drugs. (Lawyer advertising. Prior outcomes do not assure a related outcome.)

&#13

Speak to:&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP&#13

Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.&#13

321 W. 44th Street&#13

# 804&#13

New York NY 10036&#13

(212) 933-9500 (workplace phone)&#13

(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)&#13

rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Find A lot more Administrator Press Releases

Transvaginal Mesh Merchandise Brought on Extreme Injuries in Texas Lady, Alleges Lawsuit Filed by Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm devoted to safeguarding the rights of victims injured by dangerous drugs and medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Texas woman who alleges that she was injured by transvaginal mesh items. The suit was filed on June ten, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (Case No. 2:13-cv-11164) in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) entitled In Re: Coloplast Corp., Pelvic Support System Merchandise Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2387). Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson &amp Johnson and C.R. Bard, Inc. have been named as Defendants.

&#13

According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff was implanted with the Novasilk-Synthetic Flat Mesh in May 2011, the Alyte Y-Mesh in October 2012 and the TVT Exact in October 2012. These devices have been implanted to treat the Plaintiffs pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The lawsuit alleges that these devices are defective and brought on critical and possibly permanent injuries. Moreover, the Defendants allegedly knew about these defects but did not warn consumers in order to protect their own financial interests. The Plaintiff is suing for discomfort and suffering, emotional distress, and economic loss, and is seeking compensation for punitive damages.

&#13

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports that the most typical complications connected with transvaginal mesh may possibly include:

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes New Pretrial Order in Federal Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May possibly 30, 2013

Thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuit claims continue to move forward in federal litigations now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on May possibly 29th, parties in the litigations have reached an agreement regarding the delayed filing of claims and the application of the statute of limitations. According to the Order, the agreement will apply to 4 litigations underway in the Southern District of West Virginia: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327). Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in all of these proceedings.

&#13

This Order will make certain that vaginal mesh lawsuits are filed in an effective manner in these 4 proceedings. We are pleased to see these situations progressing, as we continue to hear from ladies who allegedly suffered significant vaginal mesh complications following surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firm is at present representing hundreds of girls in state and federal courts who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, pain, scarring, infection and other serious vaginal mesh complications.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Pelvic mesh devices employed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence have been the topic of a U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) security assessment because October 2008, when the agency warned that it had received more than 1,000 vaginal mesh complication reports for the duration of a 3-year period. In July 2011, the FDA changed its stance on the frequency of injuries associated with prolapse repair, stating it no longer regarded these complications to be rare. At that time, the agency revealed it had received far more than two,800 reports of vaginal mesh injuries because its 2008 communication.*

&#13

Court documents indicate that thousands of women have given that filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits, all of which allege the manufacturers of the devices have been negligent in designing the items, and failed to warn customers of their significant risks. Thousands of added transvaginal mesh claims involving goods marketed by Ethicon Inc. and C.R. Bard have been consolidated in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County, exactly where Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey, S.. Grand is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten, and In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten) He also served on the trial team in the litigations initial Ethicon mesh trial, which concluded with an award of far more than $ 11 million, including punitive damages, to the Plaintiff. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey).

&#13

Victims of alleged vaginal mesh complications could be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of info relating to transvaginal mesh lawsuits can be located at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To learn a lot more, please get in touch with 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective health-related devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.