NSA Surveillance Should Be a Reminder to Job Seekers that Employers can run Background Checks, says Selection.Com President


Cincinnati, Ohio (PRWEB) June 28, 2013

In the wake of news that NSA surveillance has breached privacy, criminal background check organizations remind job seekers that employers already have access to details to help them stay away from risky hires.

&#13

On June 24, ABC reported on this right here:&#13

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-fails-board-flight-moscow/story?id=19470645#.Uc2vwRbJAZM

&#13

As Edward Snowden evades intelligence officers from Hong Kong to Havana, and as civil rights groups raise concerns about the privacy of ordinary citizens, criminal background companies give an critical service for business owners. Details about arrests, credit history, employment history and educational history is available for employers to minimize the danger of bad hires.

&#13

With on-line access, employers are able to confirm Social Safety numbers, run credit checks, search criminal histories and far more. When asked if this kind of access to info is a violation of privacy, Choice.com President, James Boeddeker says no. We aid employers identify risky hires and eradicate that danger. This reduces business loses and closures- its a genuine service to the enterprise neighborhood. Employee theft, operate-location drug abuse, absenteeism- all of these are expenditures that firms can steer clear of by performing background checks. We see companies go out of company all the time when a basic background verify could have protected them.

&#13

Boeddekers claims check out. The American Council for Drug Education reports that a lot more than 70 % of substance abusers hold jobs. Much more alarming is the truth that one in three workers know of drug sales in the workplace. See more information right here.

&#13

Investigation by the U.S. Tiny Business Administration shows that 40% of all new company failures are due to employee theft. Occupational fraud now results in the loss of five % of annual income for every organization. See far more specifics here.

&#13

Finally, the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics reports that absenteeism and tardiness can equal up to 10% of annual payroll. Work-spot absences are greater now than they have been in years. See a lot more specifics right here.

&#13

Boeddeker says that his organization has compiled a database from more than 1,300 sources which includes over 700 million criminal records. Is it legal to shop this data or to share it with others? Boeddeker says yes. We are in full compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. More importantly, we assist our customers comply with the law. In several situations employers do not know whats needed by law.

&#13

The Fair Credit Reporting Act, or FCRA for short, supplies protection of individual citizens and places a burden on employers using this sort of information. Even if civil rights groups wanted to quit the dissemination of this data, its unlikely that all the sources of information would shut down.

&#13

So, whilst the debate rages on about privacy of information among governmental agencies, it seems that criminal background analysis is an critical element of a steady economy.

&#13

Choice.com has been a leading provider of background checks in Cincinnati and across the country for more than 20 years. Thousands of clientele across the country trust them with their organization.

Surveillance Drone Use Creating Lawmakers Nervous About Privacy Problems Privacy4Patriots Applauds Them for Intervening

Nashville, Tenn. (PRWEB) June 30, 2013

According to Fox News and other media outlets, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers are applying stress to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to clarify the purposes of its domestic drones fleet and what limitations are becoming placed upon it.

&#13

The main concern amongst lawmakers is the issue of privacy. These lawmakers are criticizing the bureau in letters and statements regarding the deployment of surveillance drones without clear guidance on how to protect privacy rights. Some lawmakers believe they want to act sooner rather than later on this problem due to the fact Congress not too long ago passed the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act, which would enable thousands of unmanned drones to seem in American skies by 2015.

&#13

Privacy4Patriots, the publisher of an upcoming report on how to defend ones privacy during an age of unprecedented technological advancements, supports the use of unmanned aircraft to hunt for terrorists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere, and to support uncover missing persons, help firefighters and address other emergencies in the U.S.

&#13

But the organization believes that drone technologies ought to be limited to keeping U.S. citizens protected, not to spy on, scare or entrap folks. The firm supports the 30-plus states that have introduced drone-associated legislation, and it encourages citizens to let their lawmakers know how they feel about this problem.

&#13

The firm also concurs with U.S. Representative Austin Scott, a Georgia Republican, who was quoted in the June 16, 2012, edition of the Atlanta Journal Constitution as saying, Had been not opposed to the use of drones. But their use has to be constant with the established guidelines with regard to search and seizure. The exact same thing that you would have to acquire to use a wiretap, you would have to have for the use of a drone. This has the potential to be a massive invasion.

&#13

Check out this Privacy4Patriots blog to find out more about how domestic drones are becoming utilised to spy on U.S. citizens.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

More Administrator Press Releases

Maryland Attorney Mike Slocumb Comments on Google Privacy Class Action Lawsuit and NSA Surveillance Case

Baltimore, MD (PRWEB) June 13, 2013

Baltimore, Maryland private injury lawyer Mike Slocumb these days said his law firm is handling a class action lawsuit that has privacy troubles similar to the ones being raised in the story involving the National Security Administration and its collection of online content.

&#13

Slocumb mentioned his client, Matthew C. Knowles of Maryland, was interviewed by CBS News on June 11, 2013. Knowles is named as a plaintiff in a Google privacy class action lawsuit (Knowles v. Google, Inc., case number five:2013cv01601) filed April 9, 2013, in California Northern District Court. The lawsuit was originally filed in the District of Maryland.

&#13

In the complaint, Knowles alleges that Googles practice of intercepting emails sent to Maryland residents with Google Gmail accounts amounts to an invasion of privacy and is in violation of the Maryland Wiretap Act.

&#13

Knowles alleges in the complaint that the search engine giant routinely intercepts messages sent by non-Gmail subscribers to Gmail accounts without their understanding or consent. The lawsuit alleges that Google makes use of the details it gathers to create a targeted advertisement directed at the non-Gmail subscriber.

&#13

There are parallels between our consumers case and the case involving the government surveillance of private citizens, stated Slocumb, a personal injury lawyer with an workplace in Baltimore. Search engine firms are monitoring private emails, and the National Safety Agency is collecting domestic telephone information. The governments actions came to light following a former employee of a government contractor blew the whistle. In the case had been handling, our client is assisting to shine a light on what these search engine organizations are doing. Its offensive and in some instances illegal when somebody intercepts communications that parties have a correct to think is sensitive, privileged and confidential.

&#13

Edward Snowden, a former employee of a government contractor who admitted leaking secret government documents about the controversial surveillance applications, might soon be facing charges, according CBSNews.com report published on June 11, 2013, and titled Feds prepping charges against Edward Snowden: Sources.

&#13

Slocumb said some other states have privacy laws similar to Marylands. He stated other lawsuits have been filed against Google and Yahoo in California, alleging that the firms violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act. The 12 states with laws stating that each parties need to consent to being wiretapped or recorded include California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington and Illinois.

&#13

Slocumb said folks who reside in any of the above-mentioned states may be entitled to be a portion of a class action lawsuit. As personal injury lawyers, we think in protecting the rights of individuals who have suffered losses, regardless of whether its in an accident or its by way of the reckless action of a big corporation. In the case involving Google, we think the search engine firm is intercepting emails and making use of the content material without having the senders permission. We think our class action lawsuit is not just about any a single particular person. Its about safeguarding the rights of every person. Its about sending a message that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated.

&#13

About the Mike Slocumb Law Firm

&#13

The Mike Slocumb Law Firm aids men and women who have been harmed by way of the negligent actions of other folks or organizations pursue compensation. The firm, which can be founded on the web at http://www.slocumblaw.com, handles class action lawsuits as properly as auto accident claims, health-related malpractice, slip and fall accidents, nursing house negligence and much more. With offices throughout the country, the law firm functions for clientele on a contingency fee basis. That indicates you pay nothing at all if you dont win. For a lot more details about what joining the Google privacy class action lawsuit, get in touch with 1-800-HURTLINE or comprehensive the on-line contact form.

&#13

The Baltimore workplace for the Mike Slocumb Law Firm is positioned at 111 S. Calvert Street, Suite 2700, Baltimore, Maryland, 21202.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Locate More Administrator Press Releases

Privacy4Patriots Applauds Lawmakers for Attempting to Regulate Domestic Surveillance Drones

Nashville, Tenn. (PRWEB) May 26, 2013

According to Fox News and other media outlets, a bipartisan group of lawmakers is seeking to limit the number of drones used for domestic surveillance in the U.S. by police and government officials amid growing concerns about privacy issues.

Lawmakers believe that they need to act quickly on this issue because Congress recently passed the Federal Aviation Administration Modernization and Reform Act, which would enable thousands of unmanned drones to appear in American skies by 2015. These lawmakers are also seeking to make flying armed drones in U.S. skies illegal.

Privacy4Patriots, the publisher of an upcoming report on how to protect ones privacy during an age of unprecedented technological advancements, supports the use of unmanned aircraft to hunt for terrorists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and elsewhere, and to help find missing persons, assist firefighters and address other emergencies in the U.S.

But the company believes that drone technology should be limited to keeping U.S. citizens safe, not to spy on, scare or entrap people. The company supports the 30-plus states that have introduced drone-related legislation, and it encourages citizens to let their lawmakers know how they feel about this issue.

The company also concurs with U.S. Representative Austin Scott, a Georgia Republican, who was quoted in the June 16, 2012, edition of the Atlanta Journal Constitution as saying, Were not opposed to the use of drones. But their use has to be consistent with the established rules with regard to search and seizure. The same thing that you would have to obtain to use a wiretap, you would have to have for the use of a drone. This has the potential to be a huge invasion.

Check out this Privacy4Patriots blog to learn about a variety of ways that are being used to spy on U.S. citizens.