Yields Finding a Ceiling After AM Data

Due to the incredibly light calendar of economic data this week, this morning’s combination of S&P PMI and Consumer Sentiment added up to the most consequential morning of market movers for bonds.  There has indeed been a bit of a reaction, but it’s playing out well within the recent range.
There was 2-way volatility following the PMI data due to stronger internals offsetting a weaker headline.  15 minutes later, calm inflation expectations and modestly lower Consumer Sentiment offered no objections to a modest rally.  Ironically, the highest volume move occurred at 10:50am ET without any clear connection to data or events (not to say there is no connection, but not one that we’ve seen).

With that, the day is essentially over unless something interesting hits the news and grabs the market’s attention (always possible, but never a given).

Highest Purchase Applications in a Year? Technically, Yes

The Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) weekly mortgage application survey showed a modest decrease in refinance applications and an even more modest increase in purchase applications. At these levels of movement, it’s just as fair to say that applications generally held steady. That’s a good thing for purchases considering last week was already at the highest levels in nearly a year, but again, there’s no real change from the previous week. The more we zoom out, the more sobering the context becomes. The counterpoint is that this context is also optimistic because short of a major meltdown in the housing/mortgage market, there’s really nowhere to go but up. Refinance demand will always be more closely tied to interest rates.  As such, it’s no surprise to see low levels persist as rates remain elevated compared to the lows seen several months ago. On a positive note, present levels are still about 30% higher than the late 2023 lows.  The big picture view of refi apps reminds us of a different time, when each new long-term low in rates meant that most mortgage holders could benefit from a refi.   Other highlights from this week’s data:
Refis accounted for 40.4% of the total, down from 42.7 last time
Adjustable rate mortgages accounted for 5.5% of the total
FHA loan were 16.5% of the total, down from 16.9%
VA loans were 14.6% of the total, down from 15.7%

Bonds Feeling Defensive Despite Trump’s Demands For Lower Rates

Bonds Feeling Defensive Despite Trump’s Demands For Lower Rates

Bonds lost ground this morning despite slightly higher Jobless Claims. There are no obvious cases for causality apart from markets generally bracing for the impact of impending fiscal changes.  Some feel that tariffs will increase inflation.  Others feel that separate policies will increase growth (or decrease revenue). None of the above is good for rates.  Notably, Trump said he would “demand” lower interest rates in his Davos speech today and 2yr Treasury yields actually dropped enough to notice, but not by enough to suggest the market is reading much into it. 

Econ Data / Events

Jobless Claims

223k vs 220k f’cast, 217k prev

Continued Claims

1899k vs 1860k f’cast, 1853k prev

Market Movement Recap

08:31 AM Slightly weaker overnight and no major change after data.  MBS down an eighth and 10yr up 2.3bps at 4.634

01:52 PM Additional weakness into 11am hour but sideways since then.  MBS down 5 ticks (.16) and 10yr up 3.7bps at 4.469

04:08 PM Still sideways after AM weakness.  MBS down 6 ticks (.19) and 10yr up 3.3bps at 4.645

No Help From Slightly Higher Jobless Claims

Yesterday’s recap began by calling attention to the “extreme dearth of big ticket economic data” this week.  Thursday AM brought the weekly jobless claims data–the first report of the week that had any sort of chance to cause some movement. A case could be made that it resulted in a very small, very temporary improvement in bonds. In context, however, this merely resulted in a brief departure from a prevailing trend toward modestly weaker levels.  There’s nothing interesting happening in the bigger picture as yields remain mostly sideways after last week’s CPI-driven recovery.

Note the seasonal volatility in non-adjusted claims (seen in two different ways in the charts below).  The point is that bond traders aren’t going to read much into small misses in this data series during the most volatile time of year with the highest seasonal distortions. 

Hedging, QC, Payment Processing, HELOC Tools; STRATMOR, CX, and Profits; Primer on Tangible Net Worth

“Be decisive. Right or wrong, make a decision. The road is paved with flat squirrels who couldn’t make a decision.” Potential borrowers wonder why mortgage rates haven’t “decided” to go down. Money is apolitical, and U.S. News reports, “Long before President Donald Trump regained control of the White House, he said on the campaign trail that he would drive down mortgage rates to 2% ‘by quickly defeating inflation.’ However, his policy proposals focusing on tariffs are more likely to rekindle inflation, while tax cuts are expected to increase the federal deficit, all of which could keep rates higher for longer. President Trump’s economic agenda could have a downstream impact on mortgage rates. Generally, the expert consensus points to higher rates as a result of Trump administration policy proposals. Research shows that tariffs tend to have an inflationary effect, potentially leading to higher mortgage rates and increased homebuilding costs. Bond pricing, and thus mortgage rates, are influenced in part by fiscal policy. Some of Trump’s proposed tax plans could increase the U.S. government’s debt burden and keep long-term interest rates elevated.” Time will tell! (Today’s podcast can be found here and this week’s is sponsored by Lender Toolkit’s new Prism. Experience a quantum leap in accuracy and efficiency as you streamline workflows, reduce errors, and close loans faster. Prism’s advanced OCR boasts 99 percent accuracy across 1,450+ document types. Effortlessly index, analyze, and underwrite crucial data with their intelligent system. Today’s has an interview with Angel Oak’s Tom Hutchens on demand in the non-QM space from both borrowers and investors.)