Tag Archives: Mirena

Mirena Lawsuits Move Ahead, as Case Management Conference is Convened in New Jersey Litigation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 04, 2013

Mirena lawsuit claims filed on behalf of ladies who have allegedly suffered significant complications, such as spontaneous device migration and uterine perforations, due to their use of the IUD, are moving forward in each state and federal courts, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. Court documents indicate that a Case Management Conference was held on July 1st in the consolidated litigation established for Mirena IUD lawsuits in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. According to an Order issued by the Court on July 2nd, attorneys for the parties have been directed to meet and confer within 30 days to reach agreement on a quantity of issues, including the status, scope, parameters and timing of discovery. The Court also scheduled the litigations next Case Management Conference for August 13, 2013. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Our Firm is actively representing women in Mirena lawsuits, and we continue to hear from alleged victims of critical Mirena complications, including spontaneous device migration and uterine perforations. We are pleased to see this litigation moving forward, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to provide free of charge legal evaluations to alleged victims of Mirena side effects.

&#13

Mirena IUD Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was approved by the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000, and later as a remedy for heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their main form of birth handle. According to court documents, Mirena lawsuits allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed its severe risks and failed to supply sufficient warnings concerning the prospective for spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD. In addition to the consolidated litigation now underway in New Jersey Superior Court, a multidistrict litigation was not too long ago established in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York for all federally-filed Mirena IUD lawsuits. A Status Conference in the federal multidistrict litigation was held on July 2nd. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

According to a June 17th report from NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, the FDA has received more than 70,000 adverse occasion reports involving Mirena given that the device was launched in 2000. Information from the FDA also indicated that given that 2008, the agency had received a lot more than 4,700 complaints of device dislocation involving Mirena, and 1,300 reports of uterine perforations. Despite these mounting adverse event reports, there has been no indication that Bayer may be arranging to announce a Mirena IUD recall any time in the future.*

&#13

Whilst a Mirena recall does not appear imminent, the FDA has taken problem in the past with some of the claims Bayer has utilised in marketing campaigns for the IUD. In 2009, the agency issued a warning letter to Bayer after obtaining that its Mirena promotions overstated the efficacy of the device and minimized its dangers. Amongst other items, the letter cited Bayer for producing statements that indicated that Mirena would assist a lady look and really feel wonderful, and enhance her sex life.**

&#13

Ladies who have allegedly suffered significant Mirena complications following spontaneous migration of the IUD may be entitled to compensation for their health-related bills, lost wages, discomfort and suffering and other damages. To find out a lot more about Mirena lawsuits, please go to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs site. To arrange for a cost-free evaluation of your potential Mirena IUD lawsuit, please contact 800-511-5092.

&#13

*newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-females-complain-about-harmful-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-handle&#13

*http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/EnforcementActivitiesbyFDA/WarningLettersandNoticeofViolationLetterstoPharmaceuticalCompanies/UCM197229.pdf

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, such as these who have been harmed by harmful drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Marketing.

Supreme Court of New Jersey Appoints Parker Waichman LLPs Raymond C. Silverman Co-Lead Counsel in Mirena IUD Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 02, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective healthcare devices and drugs, is proud to announce that Partner Raymond C. Silverman has been appointed Co-Lead Counsel in the Mirena IUD multicounty litigation (MCL) entitled In Re: Mirena Litigation (Case No. 297 Master Docket No. BER-L-4098-13). The Order announcing this was filed on July 1, 2013.

&#13

Previously, Parker Waichmans Matthew J. McCauley, Senior Litigation Counsel, was appointed Co-Lead Counsel in the Mirena IUD multidistrict litigation (MDL) now taking place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which is entitled In Re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation (Case No. 7:13-md-02434-CS). (Mr. McCauley also co-chairs the American Association for Justice (AAJ) Mirena IUD Litigation Group. The Group exchanges educational material and medical literature to aid the members greatest represent victims.)

&#13

On Could 29, 2013, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reversed an earlier decision and centralized Mirena IUD lawsuits in Bergen County, exactly where Superior Court Judge Brian R. Martinotti is managing them, according to a Notice to the Bar dated May 24, 2013.

&#13

On March six, 2013, Parker Waichman LLP had submitted an application asking the Superior Court of New Jersey to reconsider its preceding selection denying Bayers application for centralized management of multicounty litigation for Mirena IUD lawsuits. The application was entitled In Re: Application Pursuant to R. four:38A (Centralized Management of Multicounty Litigation) Joint Request for Reconsideration of Designation of Mirena litigation as a Multicounty Litigation for Centralized Management.

&#13

The application asked the court to reconsider centralizing due to the truth that more than 60 lawsuits alleging injuries from the Mirena IUD are involved in the litigation, with more lawsuits expected to be filed in the future. Parker Waichman LLP alone has filed much more than 50 cases in Morris County.

&#13

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized Bayers Mirena IUD was approved in 2000. The item is a little, t-shaped plastic device attached to two strings a hormonal IUD, it releases levonorgestrel when placed in the uterus to prevent pregnancy. Mirena is inserted and removed by a healthcare professional. It can be left in the uterus for up to five years. According to the FDA, the most serious side effects associated with the Mirena IUD contain: &#13

&#13

Hardison & Cochran Lawyers in North Carolina Are Now Reviewing Mirena IUD Injury Claims

Posted on by


Raleigh, N.C. (PRWEB) June 28, 2013

Ben Cochran, managing partner of the Hardison &amp Cochran law firm of North Carolina, announced right now that the firms lawyer are now reviewing inquiries from women who believe they might have been harmed by the Mirena IUD birth handle device.

&#13

Cochran pointed out that the birth handle item, manufactured by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., currently is the topic of federal court lawsuits that have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 2434).

&#13

He also noted that problems believed to be linked to the Mirena IUD have began to attract media consideration, including a June 18, 2013 investigative report by an Ohio ABC News affiliate, WEWS-Tv, entitled, Thousands of females complain about harmful complications from Mirena IUD birth handle.

&#13

According to the WEWS-Tv report, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received 70,072 complaints about the Mirena IUD considering that 2000, which is the year the FDA authorized the device for use as a contraceptive.

&#13

These complaints incorporate device dislocation, or situations in which the Mirena IUD is believed to have grow to be embedded in the uterus, moved from its initial placement at the leading of the uterine cavity or migrated outside the uterus, the report stated, citing a FDA spokesperson.

&#13

Its understandable that women and their families in North Carolina and elsewhere would be alarmed about possible Mirena IUD side effects in light of the ongoing litigation and news reports, Cochran stated.

&#13

When issues arise about a product, its critical to seek advice from a lawyer who can overview the facts of a case and help 1 to sort through their alternatives as they move forward, he added. At Hardison &amp Cochran, we understand that some may possibly be hesitant about talking with a lawyer. So, we make sure to give free of charge and entirely confidential consultations.

&#13

Cochran said the firm has also added content to its internet site about the Mirena IUD to give general details to patients and their families.

&#13

According to the FDA, the Mirena IUD (also called an IUS, or intrauterine technique), is a little, flexible hormone-releasing device inserted into the uterus to prevent pregnancy and is recommended for women who have had a youngster.

&#13

In 2009, the FDA authorized Mirena for therapy of heavy menstrual bleeding in girls who use intrauterine contraceptives.

&#13

About Hardison &amp Cochran, Attorneys at Law

&#13

Hardison &amp Cochran, Attorneys at Law, is a North Carolina private injury, workers compensation and Social Safety disability law firm with offices in Raleigh, Durham, Fayetteville, Dunn, New Bern, Southern Pines and Wilmington. The firms practice regions incorporate automobile accidents, truck accidents, motorcycle accidents, boating accidents, dog bites, hazardous drugs, defective medical devices, nursing home abuse and negligence and visitors violations. For a lot more information, call the firm toll-totally free at (800) 434-8399 or use the firms online contact form.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Locate Far more Administrator Press Releases

Mirena IUD Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Mirena Side Effects Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 23, 2013

Mirena IUD lawsuit claims continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. According to court documents, the subsequent Status Conference in the federal Mirena side effects litigation is scheduled for July 1, 2013. So far, practically 50 claims have been filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of women who suffered spontaneous device migration, uterine perforations, and other injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

We continue to hear from women who allegedly suffered significant Mirena side effects. We appear forward to additional progress in this litigation in the coming months, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena lawsuit consultations to ladies who have been allegedly harmed as a outcome of spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was authorized by the U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000. In 2009, Mirenas authorized makes use of have been expanded to consist of therapy of heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their approach of birth control. NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio reported on June 17th that a lot more 70,000 adverse event reports involving the Mirena IUD have been logged with the FDA because 2000, such as thousands involving device dislocation and uterine perforations.*

&#13

Court filings indicate that plaintiffs in Mirena lawsuits are alleged to have suffered severe injuries due to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Claims further allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed potential Mirena side effects and failed to offer adequate warnings with regards to the prospective for spontaneous device migration. In addition to the federal litigation now underway in the Southern District of New York, at least 100 Mirena IUD lawsuits have been filed in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Alleged victims of Mirena side effects might be eligible to file claims in either of these litigations if they suffered from injuries related to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Understand a lot more about Mirena lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For added information, please call 800-511-5092.&#13

&#13
newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-women-complain-about-unsafe-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, like those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Rottenstein Law Group LLP Comments on News Reports of Mirena IUD Side Effects

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 19, 2013

As Mirena IUD lawsuits proceed in courts, the Rottenstein Law Group LLP highlights a recent news story from an NBC affiliate in Cleveland that features the critical alleged side effects of the hormone-based contraceptive device. The Rottenstein Law Group LLP publicizes this details to help these searching to file Mirena lawsuits and who are interested in understanding more about Mirena side effects.

&#13

The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration has logged more than 70,000 complaints about the Mirena hormonal intrauterine device since the product very first went to marketplace in 2000, according to a June 17 NewsChannel five report.* Practically 5,000 of them have reported device migration, in which the IUD is displaced from its implantation website and moves to other parts of the uterus or beyond. The story even highlights a court case in which a woman alleges her Mirena IUD migrated into her rib cage.This can lead to the IUD becoming embedded in a womans uterine wall, the story stated. Far more than 1,300 ladies have complained about the IUD perforating their uteruses.

&#13

The ladies in the NBC report affirm the issues of those who get in touch with us searching to file Mirena lawsuits, said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. As far more media interest is paid to the suffering, the far more these ladies feel empowered to investigate their alternatives for compensation.

&#13

Much more than 60 Mirena lawsuits have been consolidated recently in New Jersey state court due to the fact they have widespread causes for suit, which makes it possible for for far more efficient pretrial proceedings, according to court documents in In re Mirena Litigation (Case No. 297, Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County). The plaintiffs allege the very same side effects as described in the NBC report.

&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages those with the Mirena hormonal IUD to pay a visit to this web page to download a free informational brochure about the device and users eligibility to file a lawsuit.

&#13

*nbcnews.com/id/52236628/#.UcC8cYletEI

&#13

For the most recent news on defective medicines and health-related devices and related lawsuits, check out the Rottenstein Law Group LLPs Injury Lawyer Newswire at injurylawyernewswire.com. Readers can subscribe to the news web sites stories and videos to remain on leading of individual injury news.

&#13

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-based firm that represents consumers nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has much more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent consumers hurt by defective medical devices and medicines. (Lawyer marketing. Prior benefits do not assure a similar outcome.)

&#13

Make contact with:&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP&#13

Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.&#13

321 W. 44th Street&#13

# 804&#13

New York NY 10036&#13

(212) 933-9500 (office phone)&#13

(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)&#13

rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com

&#13

Mirena Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Comments on Mounting Reports of Mirena Side Effects, Like Device Migration, Uterine Perforations

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 18, 2013

As Mirena lawsuit claims continue to move forward in each state and federal court, a new report has revealed that that the IUD has been the subject of far more than 70,000 U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) adverse occasion reports since coming on the market in 2000. According to NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio, over 4.700 Mirena customers have reported device dislocation or migration to the FDA given that 2008, even though far more than 1,300 have reportedly seasoned uterine perforations due to Mirena.*

&#13

We are not at all shocked by these numbers, as our Firm receives inquiries on a standard basis from females who have allegedly suffered uterine perforations, device migration, and other severe Mirena side effects. The injuries described in this report echo a lot of what we have heard from our own Mirena lawsuit consumers, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena IUD lawsuit consultations to females who were allegedly harmed by this contraceptive device.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

According to the NewsChannel5 report, dozens of Mirena IUD lawsuits are at the moment pending in courts around the nation. Plaintiffs in these claims have allegedly suffered horrific injuries due to dislocation of the Mirena IUD, which includes instances where the device punctured the uterus and moved into the abdominal cavity and broken other organs. In one case, a plaintiff allegedly suffered a lacerated liver due to Mirena migration, while other people had been forced to undergo hysterectomies due to the fact of their injuries. 1 lady interviewed for the report even suffered permanent nerve damage right after undergoing surgery to take away a Mirena IUD that had migrated outside of her uterus. Regardless of these types of incidents, nevertheless, there is no indication that Bayer is organizing to concern a Mirena recall for the IUD.

&#13

Court documents indicate that some 100 MIrena lawsuits are pending in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County. A Case Management Conference has been scheduled for July 1st in that litigation. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297) Meanwhile, at least 50 federally-filed Mirena side impact claims are also pending in a federal multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. Even so, attorneys interviewed for the NewsChannel5 report predicted that hundreds of added Mirena IUD lawsuits would likely be filed in the near future. (In re: Mirena IUD Merchandise Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

Girls who suffered device migration, uterine perforations and other serious Mirena side effects could be entitled to compensation for their health-related costs, lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages. To understand much more about filing a Mirena lawsuit, please pay a visit to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs internet site. For far more data, please call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*newsnet5.com/dpp/news/neighborhood_news/investigations/thousands-of-ladies-complain-about-harmful-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, such as those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Mirena Lawsuit Becoming Fueled By Troubling Statistics, Says Prominent Lawyer

Posted on by


Houston, Texas (PRWEB) June 16, 2013

Darren A. Miller of leading law firm D. Miller &amp Associates says that published data concerning the common Mirena intrauterine contraceptive device includes troubling statistics.

&#13

According to a May 21, 2013 news story by ABC News affiliate KNXV-Tv in Phoenix, the U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) has logged 59,229 reports of adverse reactions by users of the device given that 2004. The KNXV-Tv story notes that the data covers the period from November 1997 to August 2012, and that complications reported contain abdominal pain, expulsion and uterine perforation.

&#13

Integrated in the story is an FDA warning on the risks of embedment in the myometrium and perforation of the uterine wall or cervix.

&#13

“Such troubling statistics are behind the Mirena lawsuits* and ever more ladies are coming forward,” says Mirena attorney Miller. “The harm allegedly suffered due to the fact of the device ought to not be ignored. These females deserve compensation for what they have been by way of.”

&#13

“If you have seasoned any of the above complications including perforation, embedment, or migration of the device, then please contact us. We continue to aid as many girls as we canget the justice they deserve,” adds Mirena lawyer Miller.

&#13

About D. Miller &amp Associates, PLLC

&#13

Founded in 2002 by attorney Darren A. Miller, D. Miller &amp Associates, PLLC is a premier national law firm with practice places in individual injury, asbestos and mesothelioma, defective drugs and devices, and organization and criminal law. Primarily based in Houston, Texas the attorneys at D. Miller &amp Associates have successfully earned their customers compensation by means of aggressive litigation against even the most strong of defendants.

&#13

For a free of charge legal consultation get in touch with the firm at 1-855-PRO-LAWYERS or at marketing(at)dmillerlaw.com. For more information go to their site at http://www.dmillerlaw.com.&#13

&#13
In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434 Southern Dist. of New York&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13