Tag Archives: Mesh

Surgical Mesh Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Current Creation of New Federal Vaginal Mesh Litigation in Southern District of West Virginia

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 26, 2013

Surgical mesh lawsuit claims are continuing to move forward in a number of federal litigations at present underway in the Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports.

&#13

According to court documents, a federal multi-district litigation for claims involving transvaginal mesh manufactured by Cook Healthcare, Inc. was authorized on June 11th by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The initial status conference for this proceeding has been scheduled for August 1st at 9:00 a.m.* (In Re: Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair Technique Goods Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2440)

&#13

Lawsuits alleging injuries brought on by the companys mesh are now pending in the federal proceeding underway in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, where claims involving merchandise from American Medical Systems, C.R. Bard, Boston Scientific and Johnson &amp Johnsons Ethicon unit have currently been filed in separate litigations. On the date the Cook Health-related litigation was approved, court records indicate there had been 13 instances filed against the manufacturer in eight federal jurisdictions in the U.S.

&#13

Given how numerous women we hear from who have sustained mesh erosion, vaginal scarring and other injuries allegedly due to transvaginal mesh merchandise, we are not surprised that far more of these varieties of products are becoming the object of litigation, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm is actively filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of women who allegedly suffered pain, vaginal scarring, mesh erosion, infection and other injuries.

&#13

Surgical Mesh Lawsuits

&#13

In addition to lawsuits now pending in the recently developed federal litigation involving Cook Health-related mesh devices, thousands of claims have been filed in the four other transvaginal mesh proceedings established in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. These lawsuits have been filed by women who allegedly seasoned complications stemming from mesh erosion by means of the vaginal tissue, which could manifest in infection, discomfort, vaginal scarring, and other injuries. As a result, plaintiffs in these circumstances allege they now endure a diminished quality of life.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees in the following four federal vaginal mesh litigations: In re: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Merchandise Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327).

&#13

The scrutiny surrounding this class of devices has continued to mount given that 2008, when the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its initial public overall health alert warning the public that it had received far more than 1,000 adverse event reports from women implanted with the surgical material.** In 2011, the agency revised its stance on the frequency of these complications to occur from rare to not uncommon following finding that the number of complaints from vaginal mesh individuals improved 5-fold over a period of 3 years.***

&#13

Girls who could have been injured by transvaginal mesh may be eligible to get compensation for out-of-pocket medical costs, as well as lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages. Find out far more about surgical mesh lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s site. To speak with a mesh lawyer straight, call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/2440/pdfs/PTO_1.pdf&#13

**fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm&#13

***fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Security/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated individual and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, including these who have been harmed by harmful drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer items. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the country, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

C.R. Bards Transvaginal Mesh Devices Allegedly Utilize Plastic not Appropriate for Human Implantation, Notes Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 26, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm devoted to guarding the rights of victims injured by defective health-related devices, is reporting that C.R. Bard Inc., the subject of one of 5 transvaginal mesh-associated multidistrict litigations (MDL) consolidated in West Virginia, is alleged to have employed a resin-primarily based plastic said to be unsuitable for human implantation in its mesh devices, according to court records. A June 26 Bloomberg report noted that this info will be utilized in the upcoming July eight trial in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Cisson v. C.R. Bard Inc., Case No. two:11-cv-00195), exactly where it is 1 of numerous instances pending in the MDL named In Re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Method Products Liability Litigation (MDL No 2187).

&#13

Bard managers employed a resin-primarily based plastic made by a unit of Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. to make healthcare mesh devices even soon after the supplier of the material warned that the plastic need to not be permanently implanted inside folks, according to emails and documents in the lawsuit more than Bards mesh implants. Lawyers for the thousands of females who filed lawsuits as component of the MDL against C.R. Bard, faulting its Avaulta line of transvaginal implants for their injuries, mentioned that court files show that not only did business officials know that the resin-based plastic utilised in the mesh wasnt fit for human implantation they also attempted to cover up their use of it, according to the Bloomberg report.

&#13

According to Bloomberg, U.S. District Judge Goodwin ruled that the e mail correspondence relating to the resin-based mesh raised a genuine concern of material fact about whether Bard was conscious its conduct was practically specific to trigger injuries. Goodwin will oversee 20,000 lawsuits now pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Aside from C.R. Bard, the other MDLs are: In Re: Boston Scientific Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2326 In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327 In Re Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Assistance Systems Goods Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2387 and In Re: American Healthcare Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Goods Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325).

&#13

When again we are faced with the possibility that a firm is a lot more concerned with the bottom line than the overall health and wellness of the individuals getting implanted with their merchandise, said Gary P. Falkowitz, a Managing Lawyer at Parker Waichman LLP. Businesses that make health-related devices ought to be extra vigilant about the supplies they use.

&#13

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), transvaginal mesh devices had been authorized to treat tension urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), circumstances most typically triggered by weakened pelvic muscles. Transvaginal mesh devices are supposed to support right these circumstances by offering added strength to the pelvic walls. The FDA also reports that the most typical complications associated with transvaginal mesh may contain:

Bernstein Liebhard LLP Launches Surgical Mesh Recall Site to Provide Details on Vaginal Mesh Complications, Mounting Litigation

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 29, 2013

Bernstein Liebhard LLP has launched a new surgical mesh recall web site providing information to girls looking for to file lawsuits alleging injuries triggered by transvaginal mesh.

&#13

The Firms new internet site, which was created to provide useful info to females who could be suffering from pain, infection, mesh erosion and other vaginal mesh complications, consists of particulars on side effects, the oftentimes tough approach of removing transvaginal mesh devices, and updates on the expanding nationwide litigation of lawsuits filed in the U.S.

&#13

In addition to its online platform, the attorneys at Bernstein Liebhard LLP are at the moment supplying cost-free and confidential case evaluations to ladies who could be experiencing 1 or far more of the following transvaginal mesh side effects:&#13

&#13

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Federal Judge Overseeing American Healthcare Systems Surgical Mesh Lawsuits Selects Bellwether Instances, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 02, 2013

Transvaginal mesh lawsuit claims involving items manufactured by American Medical Systems, Inc. continue to move forward in a federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on July 1, 2013, four surgical mesh lawsuits have been chosen for the litigations bellwether trials. The proceedings initial trial is scheduled to start on December 3, 2013, even though a second is slated to start off on Might six, 2014. U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin will soon establish which of the 4 bellwether instances will go to trial on those dates, according to the Order. (In Re: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2325)

&#13

We are incredibly pleased to see these claims moving forward. The bellwether trials will give important clues into how other juries may possibly weigh claims in similar surgical mesh lawsuits involving American Medical Systems, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firms vaginal mesh lawyers are currently representing hundreds of girls who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, discomfort, scarring, infection and other serious injuries, allegedly due to transvaginal mesh merchandise marketed by American Health-related Systems and other manufacturers. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in the American Healthcare Systems litigation.

&#13

American Health-related Systems Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

&#13

Court documents indicate that a lot more than 7,700 surgical mesh lawsuits have been filed against American Healthcare Systems in the Southern District of West Virginia. All of the lawsuits pending in the litigation allege that American Healthcare Systems failed to provide adequate warnings with regards to the dangers linked with surgical mesh utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. It is additional alleged that plaintiffs suffered a range of serious complications due to the defective nature of these items, including chronic infections, organ harm, and mesh erosion and shrinkage.

&#13

The litigation surrounding transvaginal mesh devices utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence has been expanding given that October 2008, when the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) warned the public that it had received a lot more than 1,000 reports of serious complications linked with vaginal mesh products over a 3 year period.* Less than 3 years later, in July 2011, the FDA warned that complaints related with transvaginal prolapse repair had grown 5-fold because the 2008 alert, and stated that it no longer regarded as these varieties of injuries to be uncommon.**

&#13

American Healthcare Systems is just 1 of many producers involved in litigations for surgical mesh lawsuits established in the Southern District of West Virginia. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is also serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees for proceedings involving Boston Scientific Corp., (MDL No. 2326) C.R. Bard, Inc., (MDL No. 2187), and In re: Ethicon, Inc. (MDL No. 2327). Court documents show that the very first of the litigations bellwether trials, involving a C.R. Bard product, is scheduled to start on July 8, 2013.

&#13

Mr. Grand has also been named Co-Liaison Counsel in two consolidated litigations established for C.R. Bard and Ethicon transvaginal mesh lawsuits that are at present underway in New Jerseys Atlantic County Superior Court. He was also a member of the trial group on the very first Ethicon trial in that proceeding, which ended in March with an $ 11 million verdict for the Plaintiff. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten)

&#13

Ladies who have allegedly suffered severe complications related with transvaginal mesh may possibly be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of data with regards to transvaginal mesh lawsuits is obtainable at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To arrange for a free of charge legal consultation with an experienced mesh lawyer, please get in touch with the Firm these days by calling 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm&#13

**fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Security/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective healthcare devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the best plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Marketing.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits Improve as Statute of Limitations Approaches, Notes Rottenstein Law Group LLP

Posted on by


(PRWEB) July 02, 2013

A two-year bar for making claims approaches this month for transvaginal mesh lawsuits in some states, which has led far more men and women recently to file lawsuits with the aid of attorneys such as the Rottenstein Law Group LLP, a vaginal mesh law firm. There are presently about 16,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits in federal courts, according to court records.

&#13

On July 13, 2013, it will have been two years since the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration issued a drug safety communication* indicating that the dangers of transvaginal mesh, used to treat pelvic organ prolapse and anxiety urinary incontinence, are not uncommon. Though states statutes of limitation for claims might differ, several states set the limit to two years following an FDA alert, according to court documents in pelvic repair system liability litigations in the consolidation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (MDLs 2440, 2187, 2325, 2326, 2327 and 2387).

&#13

These limits are quite crucial. Those who think their mesh implant has harmed them must speak to a lawyer about the applicable statute of limitations for claims, said Rochelle Rottenstein, principal of the Rottenstein Law Group LLP. Very carefully contemplating regardless of whether or not to file a lawsuit to recover compensation is a need to, but waiting as well extended could mean losing any opportunity at that compensation.

&#13

Recently, lawsuits against Cook Healthcare, Inc., joined those against C.R. Bard, American Health-related Systems, Boston Scientific, Ethicon and Coloplast in a federal consolidation of lawsuits for pretrial efficiency, according to court documents.

&#13

On July 1, the federal court chose four separate surgical mesh lawsuits as bellwether trials in the AMS MDL. The very first trial is set for Dec. three. Plaintiffs in the six MDLs allege that their mesh implants have brought on them to endure adverse side effects, including erosion, bleeding, pain and infection, according to the court documents.

&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP encourages these who are interested in a lot more details to visit its transvaginal mesh FAQ web page.

&#13

*http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm262435.htm

&#13

About THE ROTTENSTEIN LAW GROUP LLP&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP is a New York-primarily based firm that represents consumers nationwide in mass tort actions. The firm was founded by Rochelle Rottenstein, who has far more than two decades of experience as a lawyer, to represent clientele hurt by defective health-related devices and drugs. (Lawyer advertising. Prior outcomes do not assure a related outcome.)

&#13

Speak to:&#13

The Rottenstein Law Group LLP&#13

Rochelle Rottenstein, Esq.&#13

321 W. 44th Street&#13

# 804&#13

New York NY 10036&#13

(212) 933-9500 (workplace phone)&#13

(212) 933-9980 (facsimile)&#13

rochelle (at) rotlaw (dot) com

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Find A lot more Administrator Press Releases

Transvaginal Mesh Merchandise Brought on Extreme Injuries in Texas Lady, Alleges Lawsuit Filed by Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm devoted to safeguarding the rights of victims injured by dangerous drugs and medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Texas woman who alleges that she was injured by transvaginal mesh items. The suit was filed on June ten, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (Case No. 2:13-cv-11164) in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) entitled In Re: Coloplast Corp., Pelvic Support System Merchandise Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2387). Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson &amp Johnson and C.R. Bard, Inc. have been named as Defendants.

&#13

According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff was implanted with the Novasilk-Synthetic Flat Mesh in May 2011, the Alyte Y-Mesh in October 2012 and the TVT Exact in October 2012. These devices have been implanted to treat the Plaintiffs pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The lawsuit alleges that these devices are defective and brought on critical and possibly permanent injuries. Moreover, the Defendants allegedly knew about these defects but did not warn consumers in order to protect their own financial interests. The Plaintiff is suing for discomfort and suffering, emotional distress, and economic loss, and is seeking compensation for punitive damages.

&#13

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports that the most typical complications connected with transvaginal mesh may possibly include:

New Surgical Mesh Lawsuit Internet site Launched by Bernstein Liebhard LLP Provides Updated Information on Complications, Developing Litigation

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 30, 2013

A new site dedicated to delivering data to girls searching for to file surgical mesh lawsuit claims has been launched by Bernstein Liebhard LLP. Amidst other vital information, the Firms new internet site describes goods allegedly connected with mesh erosion and other transvaginal mesh complications, as well as the procedure of surgical removal and updates on lawsuits that have already been filed against transvaginal mesh makers in the U.S.

&#13

In addition to getting readily accessible to answer any queries you may possibly have about a prospective vaginal mesh lawsuit, the Firm is also providing confidential case evaluations to women who might have experienced 1 or far more of the following vaginal mesh complications: &#13

&#13

Ethicon Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Continue, as Claims in New Jersey Litigation Exceed 3,000, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 21, 2013

Vaginal mesh lawsuit filings involving Ethicon Inc.s Gynecare pelvic mesh items continue to mount in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Atlantic County Superior Court, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to the most recent Case List issued by the Court, 3,017 claims have been filed in the New Jersey Ethicon litigation on behalf of alleged victims of vaginal mesh complications. Firm partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel for this litigation. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten).

&#13

It is not at all surprising that the vaginal mesh lawsuits filed in the New Jersey Ethicon litigation have reached this milestone. Practically two years following the FDA issued its final public overall health notification with regards to the risks linked with transvaginal mesh, we continue to hear from alleged victims of vaginal mesh complications on a standard basis, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to evaluate transvaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of women allegedly injured by pelvic mesh products marketed by Ethicon, Inc. and other companies.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Concerns over complications related with transvaginal mesh devices have been mounting considering that October 2008, when the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) alerted the public that it had received much more than 1,000 adverse occasion reports involving individuals who had received the implants to treat pelvic organ prolapse and anxiety urinary incontinence. In July 2011, the FDA issued a second alert after such reports improved by five-fold, with the regulator now warning that the frequency of complications related with transvaginal prolapse repair was not rare. According to the agency, the most frequently reported vaginal mesh complications contain mesh erosion via the vaginal epithelium, pain, urinary difficulties and infection.*

&#13

In March, the Plaintiff in the initial Ethicon mesh lawsuit to head to trial in the U.S. was awarded more than $ 11 million, like $ 7.76 million in punitive damages, after a jury in New Jersey Superior Court discovered that patients were not properly warned about the risks associated with the Gynecare Prolift device. Jeffrey S. Grand also served on the Plaintiffs trial group for this case. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey)

&#13

Mr. Grand is also serving as Co-Liaison Counsel for a consolidated litigation underway in Atlantic County Superior Court for lawsuits involving pelvic mesh manufactured by C.R. Bard Inc. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten), and is a member of the Plaintiffs Steering Committees in four federal transvaginal mesh multi-district litigations underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. These proceedings incorporate: In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., In Re: American Healthcare Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2327). The 1st trial in that litigation, involving a C.R. Bard vaginal mesh lawsuit, is scheduled to begin on July 8, 2013.

&#13

Alleged victims of vaginal mesh injuries might be eligible to seek compensation for health-related costs, discomfort and suffering and other damages. Learn a lot more about how to file a vaginal mesh lawsuit by going to Bernstein Liebhard’s internet site, or by contacting one particular of the Firms attorneys straight at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

(800) 511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes New Pretrial Order in Federal Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May possibly 30, 2013

Thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuit claims continue to move forward in federal litigations now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on May possibly 29th, parties in the litigations have reached an agreement regarding the delayed filing of claims and the application of the statute of limitations. According to the Order, the agreement will apply to 4 litigations underway in the Southern District of West Virginia: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327). Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in all of these proceedings.

&#13

This Order will make certain that vaginal mesh lawsuits are filed in an effective manner in these 4 proceedings. We are pleased to see these situations progressing, as we continue to hear from ladies who allegedly suffered significant vaginal mesh complications following surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firm is at present representing hundreds of girls in state and federal courts who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, pain, scarring, infection and other serious vaginal mesh complications.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Pelvic mesh devices employed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence have been the topic of a U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) security assessment because October 2008, when the agency warned that it had received more than 1,000 vaginal mesh complication reports for the duration of a 3-year period. In July 2011, the FDA changed its stance on the frequency of injuries associated with prolapse repair, stating it no longer regarded these complications to be rare. At that time, the agency revealed it had received far more than two,800 reports of vaginal mesh injuries because its 2008 communication.*

&#13

Court documents indicate that thousands of women have given that filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits, all of which allege the manufacturers of the devices have been negligent in designing the items, and failed to warn customers of their significant risks. Thousands of added transvaginal mesh claims involving goods marketed by Ethicon Inc. and C.R. Bard have been consolidated in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County, exactly where Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey, S.. Grand is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten, and In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten) He also served on the trial team in the litigations initial Ethicon mesh trial, which concluded with an award of far more than $ 11 million, including punitive damages, to the Plaintiff. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey).

&#13

Victims of alleged vaginal mesh complications could be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of info relating to transvaginal mesh lawsuits can be located at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To learn a lot more, please get in touch with 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective health-related devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.