Tag Archives: Litigation

Mirena IUD Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Mirena Side Effects Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 23, 2013

Mirena IUD lawsuit claims continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. According to court documents, the subsequent Status Conference in the federal Mirena side effects litigation is scheduled for July 1, 2013. So far, practically 50 claims have been filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of women who suffered spontaneous device migration, uterine perforations, and other injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

We continue to hear from women who allegedly suffered significant Mirena side effects. We appear forward to additional progress in this litigation in the coming months, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena lawsuit consultations to ladies who have been allegedly harmed as a outcome of spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was authorized by the U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000. In 2009, Mirenas authorized makes use of have been expanded to consist of therapy of heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their approach of birth control. NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio reported on June 17th that a lot more 70,000 adverse event reports involving the Mirena IUD have been logged with the FDA because 2000, such as thousands involving device dislocation and uterine perforations.*

&#13

Court filings indicate that plaintiffs in Mirena lawsuits are alleged to have suffered severe injuries due to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Claims further allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed potential Mirena side effects and failed to offer adequate warnings with regards to the prospective for spontaneous device migration. In addition to the federal litigation now underway in the Southern District of New York, at least 100 Mirena IUD lawsuits have been filed in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Alleged victims of Mirena side effects might be eligible to file claims in either of these litigations if they suffered from injuries related to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Understand a lot more about Mirena lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For added information, please call 800-511-5092.&#13

&#13
newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-women-complain-about-unsafe-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, like those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Ethicon Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Continue, as Claims in New Jersey Litigation Exceed 3,000, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 21, 2013

Vaginal mesh lawsuit filings involving Ethicon Inc.s Gynecare pelvic mesh items continue to mount in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Atlantic County Superior Court, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to the most recent Case List issued by the Court, 3,017 claims have been filed in the New Jersey Ethicon litigation on behalf of alleged victims of vaginal mesh complications. Firm partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel for this litigation. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten).

&#13

It is not at all surprising that the vaginal mesh lawsuits filed in the New Jersey Ethicon litigation have reached this milestone. Practically two years following the FDA issued its final public overall health notification with regards to the risks linked with transvaginal mesh, we continue to hear from alleged victims of vaginal mesh complications on a standard basis, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to evaluate transvaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of women allegedly injured by pelvic mesh products marketed by Ethicon, Inc. and other companies.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Concerns over complications related with transvaginal mesh devices have been mounting considering that October 2008, when the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) alerted the public that it had received much more than 1,000 adverse occasion reports involving individuals who had received the implants to treat pelvic organ prolapse and anxiety urinary incontinence. In July 2011, the FDA issued a second alert after such reports improved by five-fold, with the regulator now warning that the frequency of complications related with transvaginal prolapse repair was not rare. According to the agency, the most frequently reported vaginal mesh complications contain mesh erosion via the vaginal epithelium, pain, urinary difficulties and infection.*

&#13

In March, the Plaintiff in the initial Ethicon mesh lawsuit to head to trial in the U.S. was awarded more than $ 11 million, like $ 7.76 million in punitive damages, after a jury in New Jersey Superior Court discovered that patients were not properly warned about the risks associated with the Gynecare Prolift device. Jeffrey S. Grand also served on the Plaintiffs trial group for this case. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey)

&#13

Mr. Grand is also serving as Co-Liaison Counsel for a consolidated litigation underway in Atlantic County Superior Court for lawsuits involving pelvic mesh manufactured by C.R. Bard Inc. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten), and is a member of the Plaintiffs Steering Committees in four federal transvaginal mesh multi-district litigations underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. These proceedings incorporate: In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., In Re: American Healthcare Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2327). The 1st trial in that litigation, involving a C.R. Bard vaginal mesh lawsuit, is scheduled to begin on July 8, 2013.

&#13

Alleged victims of vaginal mesh injuries might be eligible to seek compensation for health-related costs, discomfort and suffering and other damages. Learn a lot more about how to file a vaginal mesh lawsuit by going to Bernstein Liebhard’s internet site, or by contacting one particular of the Firms attorneys straight at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

(800) 511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Inland Empire Homeowners Resort to Foreclosure Litigation to Keep in Properties

Posted on by


Riverside, CA (PRWEB) January 19, 2012

De Novo Law Firm, a leading bankruptcy and loan modification law firm primarily based in Riverside, California, nowadays announced an increase in the quantity of Inland Empire home owners employing foreclosure litigation as a signifies to stay in their homes and safeguard themselves against predatory lending practices. De Novo Law Firm has effectively represented clients in Riverside, Orange, and Los Angeles County in lawsuits against the biggest banks. These situations consist of lawsuits for lenders failure to comply with loan modification terms, unlawful foreclosure practices, and failure to comply with federal loan regulations.

&#13

If you took out a loan in the last ten years, there is a great possibility that the loan terms could have been misleading or even fraudulent, mentioned Benjamin Yrungaray, Owner, De Novo Law Firm. Regardless of how hopeless the predicament could look, home owners have many alternatives which includes foreclosure litigation.

&#13

Under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Actual Estate Loan Procedures Act (RESPA), and other state remedies, De Novo Law Firm may be able to assist homeowners have their loan modified or they might be entitled to monetary damages.

&#13

De Novo Law firm has effectively represented clients against Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase Bank, Wells Fargo, IndyMac Bank, OneWest Bank, Greentree, Citi Home Mortgage, GMAC Mortgage, OCWEN, Countrywide House Loan, Washington Mutual, and many other banks and credit unions. De Novo Law Firm has successfully litigated circumstances stopping foreclosure, maintaining owners in their homes, and acquiring permanent resolution of their fraudulent loan.

&#13

For a lot more data or to schedule a cost-free consultation with an lawyer, visit http://www.denovofirm.com.

&#13

About De Novo Law Firm

&#13

At De Novo Law Firm, bankruptcy, loan modification and litigation instances are handled by an experienced lawyer, not a secretary or paralegal. The firm is A-rated with the Greater Enterprise Bureau, provides a money-back guarantee for bankruptcy filings, and performs with clients to develop a payment plan that meets their needs. Lawyer Benjamin Yrungaray began De Novo Law Firm and serves clientele in the Inland Empire, Orange County and Los Angeles County. For a lot more data visit http://www.denovofirm.com.

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Biomet Hip Lawsuits Mount in Federal Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacement Litigation, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 16, 2013

Biomet hip lawsuit claims alleging severe injuries due to the Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacement Technique continue to mount in a federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to an MDL Statistics Report issued on May possibly 14th by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), at least 308 Biomet hip replacement claims have been filed in the federal litigation given that it was established in October 2012. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Goods Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

&#13

We continue to hear from people fitted with metal-on-metal hip implants, including the Biomet M2a Magnum, who allegedly suffered significant complications linked with the failure of their device. It is not surprising that the number of Biomet hip replacement lawsuits filed in this litigation has currently surpassed 300, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is actively filing Biomet hip lawsuits in the federal multidistrict litigation, and continues to supply totally free and confidential case evaluations to men and women who might have been injured by Biomet M2a Magnum implants.

&#13

Biomet Hip Replacement Lawsuits&#13

According to court documents, Biomet hip lawsuits allege the metal-on-metal style of the Biomet M2a Magnum implant is prone to put on, and can create higher metal ion levels. This could trigger sufferers to endure metallosis and other adverse tissue reactions, premature device failure and other complications that necessitate revision surgery to get rid of and replace the device. When the multidistrict litigation was established by the JPML in October 2011, 66 Biomet hip replacement claims had been pending in federal courts all through the U.S.

&#13

The U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) has been investigating metal-on-metal hip implants because February 2011, amid concerns that metal ions shed from the hips can outcome in metallosis, adverse neighborhood tissue reactions, and early failure. In January, the agency issued new guidance for hip replacement patients fitted with these devices that suggested metal ion testing in those experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. The FDA also mentioned it had proposed a new rule that would make all-metal hips ineligible for 510(k) approvals, a process which permitted metal-on-metal hips to come to market without having very first undergoing human clinical trials.*

&#13

Biomet M2a Magnum hip recipients who allegedly suffered injuries as a result of the device might be entitled to compensation for their healthcare expenses, lost wages and discomfort and suffering. To understand a lot more about the litigation surrounding this and other metal-on-metal hip implants, please visit Bernstein Liebhard LLPs site, or get in touch with 1 our attorneys today at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, such as those who have been harmed by hazardous drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer goods. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the best plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Kramer Law: Mortgage Litigation Index Shows Dramatic Increase in Mortgage Servicing Litigation

Posted on by


Calabasas, CA (PRWEB) June 22, 2011

Lead lawyer at for the Law Offices of Kramer and Kaslow, Philip Kramer, not too long ago released comments on the newest Mortgage Litigation Index numbers compiled by MortgageDaily.com. According to the newest Mortgage Litigation Index, mortgage servicing litigation increased 88 percent for the duration of the first quarter, according to MortgageDaily.com. The increasing quantity of lawsuits suggests economic institutions will be increasingly below pressure to resolve outstanding mortgage and foreclosure problems.

&#13

Philip A. Kramer, a noted lawyer who represents hundreds of property owners who have filed consolidated plaintiff litigation lawsuits against six of the nations largest lenders, commented on what he feels that the statistics indicate.

&#13

What youre seeing here are the cumulative final results of years of egregious conduct that have not been properly addressed by regulatory authorities. Kramer finds especially noteworthy the dramatic increase in investor and criminal litigation. If you appear at these charts, says attorney Kramer, You see that investors are increasingly turning to the courts for redress. The courts have turn out to be the significant avenue of redress due to the fact other institutions have failed. At least until now. The charts also show an elevated number of criminal suits which suggests that government neighborhood, state and federal — is developing increasingly active in redressing some of these troubles.

&#13

Philip Kramer observes, It looks to me like we have reached a tipping point. Either banks are going to settle voluntarily, or the courts are going to impose options. A single way or another, it appears like a resolution is on the way.

&#13

A lot more of Philip Kramers thoughts can be located at the Kramer and Kaslow weblog.

&#13

ABOUT PHILIP KRAMER&#13

PHILIP A. KRAMER is the senior partner of the Law Office of Kramer &amp Kaslow, in Calabasas, California. Kramer &amp Kaslow is Martindale Hubbell AV rated. Mr. Kramer is a perennial recipient of the prestigious Southern California Super Lawyer award.

&#13

Mr. Kramer received his undergraduate degree from Ohio State University and his Juris Doctorate from the Catholic University of America, in Washington, DC. His practice emphasizes industrial litigation and trial advocacy, with a concentration on organization litigation, and genuine property matters. He has prosecuted and defended cases for over twenty five years.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is a licensed real estate broker and has spent considerable time providing legal services in connection with genuine estate concerns relating to loan modification and loss mitigation, land use and zoning, environmental problems, easements, building and improvement, finance, and landlord tenant matters.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is admitted to practice before all courts in the State of California, the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Military Appeals. Mr. Kramer has tried in excess of 200 instances. He has appeared on nationally televised programs concerning pre-trial process and trial strategy and has appeared as a guest lecturer on topics ranging from constitutional law to trial practice, and Mr. Kramer frequently lectures on a broad spectrum of numerous legal and company concerns.

&#13

Mr. Kramer also serves as a Judge Pro Tem for the Los Angeles Superior Court and as a Mediator.

&#13

Mr. Kramer is also a previous president of the Los Angeles West Inns of Court, a national organization committed to bringing professionalism and civility back into the legal profession. He also serves on quite a few Boards of Directors and serves as an officer in several companies. For much more info get in touch with (818) 224-3900 or check out http://kramer-kaslow.com

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

California Case Alleging Negligent Servicing by Ocwen Survives Initial Stages of Litigation.

Posted on by


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) July 10, 2012

UFAN Legal Group, Pc (UFAN) won an crucial victory recently in its suit against Ocwen Loan Serivicing, LLP (Ocwen). The lawsuit survived demurrer filed by Ocwen and the case is now expected to either settle or move forward to trial.

&#13

UFAN filed its complaint against Ocwen on February 9, 2012 in Alameda County Superior Court (case quantity RG12616583) on behalf of borrowers whose loans are serviced by Ocwen. The case targets Ocwens alleged damaging servicing practices, which includes the banks improper handling of mortgage modifications. The case was amended on May 2, 2012.

&#13

On June 28, 2012, the Honorable Robert B. Freedman in the case ruled that Plaintiffs servicing claim was sufficiently plead and that the claim will proceed to trial unless the parties very first settle. Ocwen was given 30 days from the judgment to answer the complaint.

&#13

Primarily based on the indications of each parties that settlement negotiations were ongoing, the judge has allowed 120 days just before the subsequent case management conference to allow the parties to attempt to settle the claims out-of-court.

&#13

UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed property owners who have been allegedly injured by poor company practices of banks, and who have been left without having help from other government sponsored programs.

&#13

If you believe you could have been injured by your lender or loan servicer, UFAN offers complementary attorney consultations to assist distressed property owners in assessing attainable alternatives for relief like, but not restricted to, litigation and bankruptcy.

&#13

Click here to get in touch with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Lawyer NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Computer dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-based law firm delivering mortgage litigation and other debt related legal services. The devoted attorneys and staff at UFAN function tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its clients. For far more data call toll totally free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release may constitute lawyer advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the lawyer responsible for this advertisement. The info in this release and on the UFAN website (ufanlaw.com) is for general info purposes only. Nothing at all in this release or on the UFAN web site need to be taken as legal advice. Prior successes are no guarantee of future efficiency. Litigation is inherently uncertain and results in litigation are never ever assured.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Related Loan Modification Services Press Releases

The Law Offices of Michael D. Stewart has Moved its Miami Workplace to 200 SE 1st St, Suite 701, Miami, Florida – Miami Litigation Lawyers – Private Injury, True Estate Law

Posted on by


Miami, Florida (PRWEB) September 05, 2012

The Miami Law Offices of Michael D. Stewart have changed their workplace address. The new address of The Law Offices of Michael D. Stewart is situated at 200 SE 1st St, Suite 701, Miami, Florida 33131. The law workplace is situated near Brickell Avenue and Biscayne Blvd. in downtown Miami, Florida, close to Bayside Marketplace. Our attorneys are close to the Miami International Airport, the Dolphin Expressway, Kendell, South Miami, Hialeah, Little Havana, Aventura and Fort Lauderdale. The law workplace Miami Attorneys will continue to give Litigation, Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, Medical Malpractice, and Item Liability solutions together with Actual Estate legal solutions, like, Foreclosure Defense, Mortgage Loan Modification, Short Sale, Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, Deed for Lease, Fraud, Eviction, Ejection, and Condo and Coop representation and other debt matters such as representation ahead of the IRS, Credit Card Debt and Mortgage Debt.

&#13

Get in touch with The Law Offices of Michael D. Stewart for a free of charge consultation at 866-438-6574 or check out us on the internet at http://www.TheMiamiLaw.com or http://www.GotPersonalInjury.com. Our attorneys are on call 24 hours per day to assist you with your legal wants. Our attorneys deal with circumstances throughout Florida and New York. No legal matter is too big or as well tiny. From modest legal concerns to Complex litigation.

&#13

Let our Miami Lawyers aid place the law on your side. Our clients pay No fee for injury matters until monetary recovery for your loss and damages.

&#13

Authorized to practice law in Florida and New York. State and Federal Courts. Member of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Florida. Registered Florida True Estate Agent with the Department of Organization and Professional Regulation.

&#13

Get in touch with us Today at 866-438-6574. The get in touch with and the consultation are free.

&#13

Law Offices of Michael D. Stewart

&#13

http://www.TheMiamiLaw.com

&#13

http://www.GotPersonalInjury.com

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Actos Lawsuits: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Far more Than 1,500 Situations Now Filed in Federal Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 02, 2013

Court documents indicate that more than 1,500 Actos lawsuit claims alleging bladder cancer are now pending in a federal litigation underway in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports.

&#13

According to court records, an update on the number of Actos filings in the federal litigation was presented at a May 23rd status conference, which also addressed troubles associated to the status of discovery and the scheduling of bellwether trials in the litigation. Lawsuits filed in this proceeding allege the possible for long-term use of Actos, a type two diabetes drug manufactured by Takeda Pharmaceuticals, to trigger or worsen bladder cancer. (In re: Actos Solution Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299)

&#13

As we continue to receive inquiries about prospective Actos lawsuits from individuals who allege extended-term use of the drug triggered their bladder cancer, we are pleased to see this litigation moving forward, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firm is at the moment offering free Actos bladder cancer lawsuit evaluations to individuals who developed bladder cancer right after utilizing the medication for an extended period of time.

&#13

Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Allegations

&#13

The federal multidistrict litigation for Actos bladder cancer lawsuits was produced in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana in December 2011, after the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration issued an alert warning the public that long-term use of the medication might increase a individuals threat for establishing bladder cancer.* There are now 1,500 instances pending in in the Western District of Louisiana, exactly where the proceeding continues to move forward. According to court documents, the next status conference in the litigation has been scheduled for June 20, 2013. Court records further indicate the first bellwether trials for the Actos bladder cancer litigation have been scheduled as effectively, with the initial trial is slated to begin on January 27, 2014, with the second to adhere to on April 14, 2014.

&#13

In addition to the federal litigation, Bloomberg.com reported on May 1st that claims filed more than the medication employed to manage blood-sugar levels in type 2 diabetes sufferers are pending in state litigations in Illinois and California.**

&#13

Individuals who took Actos and developed bladder cancer following lengthy-term use of the drug may possibly be eligible to seek compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages. Understand more about how to file an Actos lawsuit by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs web site or by calling a single of the Firms Actos lawyers at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*FDA, June 15, 2011 fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm259150.htm&#13

**bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-01/takeda-gets-six-five-million-diabetes-drug-verdict-thrown-out.html

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by harmful drugs, defective health-related devices and customer goods. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP&#13

10 East 40th Street&#13

New York, New York 10016&#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes New Pretrial Order in Federal Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May possibly 30, 2013

Thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuit claims continue to move forward in federal litigations now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on May possibly 29th, parties in the litigations have reached an agreement regarding the delayed filing of claims and the application of the statute of limitations. According to the Order, the agreement will apply to 4 litigations underway in the Southern District of West Virginia: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327). Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in all of these proceedings.

&#13

This Order will make certain that vaginal mesh lawsuits are filed in an effective manner in these 4 proceedings. We are pleased to see these situations progressing, as we continue to hear from ladies who allegedly suffered significant vaginal mesh complications following surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firm is at present representing hundreds of girls in state and federal courts who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, pain, scarring, infection and other serious vaginal mesh complications.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Pelvic mesh devices employed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence have been the topic of a U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) security assessment because October 2008, when the agency warned that it had received more than 1,000 vaginal mesh complication reports for the duration of a 3-year period. In July 2011, the FDA changed its stance on the frequency of injuries associated with prolapse repair, stating it no longer regarded these complications to be rare. At that time, the agency revealed it had received far more than two,800 reports of vaginal mesh injuries because its 2008 communication.*

&#13

Court documents indicate that thousands of women have given that filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits, all of which allege the manufacturers of the devices have been negligent in designing the items, and failed to warn customers of their significant risks. Thousands of added transvaginal mesh claims involving goods marketed by Ethicon Inc. and C.R. Bard have been consolidated in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County, exactly where Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey, S.. Grand is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten, and In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten) He also served on the trial team in the litigations initial Ethicon mesh trial, which concluded with an award of far more than $ 11 million, including punitive damages, to the Plaintiff. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey).

&#13

Victims of alleged vaginal mesh complications could be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of info relating to transvaginal mesh lawsuits can be located at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To learn a lot more, please get in touch with 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective health-related devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Biomet Hip Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Biomet Hip Replacement Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May 26, 2013

The federal litigation established for Biomet hip lawsuits continues to move forward in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to the Courts website, the litigations next Case Management Conference has been scheduled for June 17th. All of the lawsuits pending in the Biomet hip replacement litigation allege the metal-on-metal design of the Biomet M2a Magnum hip can generate high levels of metal ions, leading to metallosis in the surrounding tissue and early failure of the device. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

Our Firm is already representing clients in the federal Biomet hip replacement litigation, and continues to receive inquiries from Biomet M2a hip recipients who have allegedly suffered serious and debilitating complications related to the metal-on-metal device. We are pleased to see this proceeding moving forward, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to offer free Biomet hip lawsuit evaluations to individuals allegedly injured by the Biomet M2a hip.

Biomet Hip Lawsuits

Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacements are metal-on-metal hip implants, which consist of a ball and cup made from a chromium-cobalt alloy. As of March 2013, court documents indicated that more than 140 Biomet hip lawsuits were pending in the federal Biomet hip replacement litigation. All federally-filed Biomet hip lawsuits were ordered transferred to the Northern District of Indiana in October 2012, in anticipation of a large number of claims.

This past January, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned that metal debris shed as metal-on-metal hip components wear may accumulate to dangerous levels in the body. This occurrence can result in bone and/or soft tissue damage in the area surrounding the implant and joint, leading to adverse local tissue reactions, premature device failure, and even additional symptoms or illnesses elsewhere in the body. Among other things, the FDA cautioned doctors to consider metal ion testing if patients are experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. According to the January announcement, the FDA is considering implementing new regulations for metal-on-metal hip implants that would make the devices ineligible for 510(k) clearances, which allowed such implants to come to market without human clinical trials.*

Alleged victims of Biomet hip replacement problems, including metallosis, hip implant failure, and other serious complications may be entitled to compensation for their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. A wealth of information about Biomet hip lawsuits is available at Bernstein Liebhards website. For additional information, please contact one of our attorneys today by calling 800-511-5092.

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP

10 East 40th Street

New York, New York 10016

800-511-5092

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.