Tag Archives: Forward

Biomet Hip Lawsuits Move Forward, As Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports on Latest Case Management Conference in Federal Biomet Hip Replacement Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Hundreds of Biomet hip lawsuits involving the Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacement Program continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana. According to a Memorandum issued by the Court on June 24th, the Biomet hip replacement litigations most recent case management conference was held on June 17, 2013, at which time a quantity of issues had been addressed, including pending motions to strike affirmative defenses, jurisdictional issues connected to the current dismissal of improperly named defendants, and the use of a kind complaint. At the conclusion of the conference, the parties presented a tutorial on the scientific and technical issues involved in the Biomet hip replacement lawsuits. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Items Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

&#13

This most current conference addressed a number of crucial concerns. We are pleased to see the Biomet hip replacement litigation moving ahead, and look forward to extra progress in the future, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is representing customers in Biomet hip lawsuits in the federal multidistrict litigation, and continues to supply free of charge and confidential case evaluations to people who may possibly have been injured by Biomet M2a Magnum implants.

&#13

Biomet Hip Replacement Lawsuits&#13

Court documents indicate that far more than 300 Biomet hip lawsuits are now pending in the federal multidistrict litigation. All of the claims allege the Biomet M2a Magnum implants metal-on-metal design can shed dangerous amounts of toxic metal debris as a outcome of wear, top to metallosis and other adverse tissue reactions, as effectively as premature device failure. According to the June 17th Memorandum, the Biomet hip replacement litigations next case management conference has been scheduled for September 23, 2013, whilst a telephonic status conference is set for July 29, 2013.

&#13

The U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) has been reviewing the security of metal-on-metal hip implants like the Biomet M2a Magnum considering that February 2011. In January, the FDA warned that the metal debris shed from these devices can trigger damage to bone and/or tissue surrounding the implant and joint, top to discomfort, implant loosening, device failure, and the want for revision surgery to replace the device. At that time, the agency advised recipients of metal-on-metal hip replacements to undergo metal ion testing if they are experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. The FDA also stated it had proposed a new rule that would make all-metal hips ineligible for 510(k) approvals, a process which allowed such devices to come to market place with out first undergoing human clinical trials.*

&#13

Alleged victims of metal-on-metal hip implant complications associated to the Biomet M2a Magnum hip could be entitled to compensation for their medical expenditures, lost wages and discomfort and suffering. To understand far more about the Biomet hip replacement litigation, please check out Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For further data about filing a Biomet hip lawsuit, please contact 1 our attorneys today at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated individual and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective health-related devices and customer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the leading plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Mirena IUD Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Mirena Side Effects Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 23, 2013

Mirena IUD lawsuit claims continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. According to court documents, the subsequent Status Conference in the federal Mirena side effects litigation is scheduled for July 1, 2013. So far, practically 50 claims have been filed in the Southern District of New York on behalf of women who suffered spontaneous device migration, uterine perforations, and other injuries, allegedly due to the Mirena IUD. (In re: Mirena IUD Items Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434)

&#13

We continue to hear from women who allegedly suffered significant Mirena side effects. We appear forward to additional progress in this litigation in the coming months, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm continues to provide free Mirena lawsuit consultations to ladies who have been allegedly harmed as a outcome of spontaneous migration of the Mirena IUD.

&#13

Mirena Lawsuits&#13

The Mirena IUD was authorized by the U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) as a birth control strategy in 2000. In 2009, Mirenas authorized makes use of have been expanded to consist of therapy of heavy menstrual bleeding in females who wish to use an IUD as their approach of birth control. NewsChannel5 in Cleveland, Ohio reported on June 17th that a lot more 70,000 adverse event reports involving the Mirena IUD have been logged with the FDA because 2000, such as thousands involving device dislocation and uterine perforations.*

&#13

Court filings indicate that plaintiffs in Mirena lawsuits are alleged to have suffered severe injuries due to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Claims further allege that Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals downplayed potential Mirena side effects and failed to offer adequate warnings with regards to the prospective for spontaneous device migration. In addition to the federal litigation now underway in the Southern District of New York, at least 100 Mirena IUD lawsuits have been filed in a consolidated litigation underway in New Jerseys Bergen County Superior Court. (In Re: Mirena Litigation Case No. 297)

&#13

Alleged victims of Mirena side effects might be eligible to file claims in either of these litigations if they suffered from injuries related to spontaneous migration of the IUD. Understand a lot more about Mirena lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For added information, please call 800-511-5092.&#13

&#13
newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/investigations/thousands-of-women-complain-about-unsafe-complications-from-mirena-iud-birth-manage

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, like those who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective medical devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Corporate Whistle Blower Center Now Urges FHA-VA Mortgage Originators Servicing Appraisal or Underwriting Whistleblowers with Proof of Fraud to Step Forward – Large Rewards

Posted on by


(PRWEB) April 03, 2012

The Corporate Whistle Blower Center is urging bank, mortgage banking, bank originators, or loan servicing insiders to step forward for potentially multi million dollar rewards, if they possess significant,and substantial proof of any kind of substantial appraisal fraud, or key wrongdoing involving FHA, VA, Fannie, or Freddie mortgages. The group’s crucial is concentrate is main bank managers, loan servicing insiders, or key homebuilder mortgage managers, who knew about inflated appraisals for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, or VA mortgages, and nevertheless have the proof. The time frames are 2003-2008. The Corporate Whistle Blower Center Mortgage Whistleblower Initiative is hunting for the following kinds of whistleblowers: &#13

&#13
On the mortgage origination side the Corporate Whistle Blower Center is seeking for key bank, mortgage banker, house builder mortgage managers, or insiders, who can prove their bank, or mortgage lender employer was committing appraisal fraud, as well as gouging borrowers on fees, or not complying with certain guidelines that govern Fannie, Freddie, FHA, or VA mortgages. &#13
On the loan serving side, The Corporate Whistle Blower Center is hunting for folks who possess substantial proof, their bank or loan serving firm employer was intentionally misapplying payments for principal, interest, and/or for reserves. The group is also looking for bank, or loan servicing insiders, whose firm took federal funds to do loan modifications, and alternatively of performing a loan modification the bank, or loan servicer did a foreclosure. No one particular ever checked the file. &#13
On the Wall Street side: The Corporate Whistle Blower Center is hunting for insiders, who were bundling, or packaging Mortgage Backed Securities, understanding full well the mortgage backed securities ought to have been in no way offered a A, a AA, or a AAA rating. The Corporate Whistle Blower Center says, “The Mortgage Backed Securities circumstances could reap rewards in the tens, and tens of millions of dollars, but the proof has to be substantial, and easy to stick to.”

The Corporate Whistle Blower Center says, “Again, the wrongdoing has to be widespread, and the proof has to be significant, and quite easy to see.” For much more data, bank or mortgage lender insiders or loan servicing insiders are encouraged to make contact with the Corporate Whistle Blower Center anytime at 866-714-6466, or they can make contact with the group via their web internet site at http://CorporateWhistleBlowerCenter.com

&#13

Simple rules for a whistle blower from the Corporate Whistle Blower Center: &#13

Do not go to the government initial, if you are a main whistle blower. The Corporate Whistle Blower Center says, “Significant whistle blowers frequently go to the federal government thinking they will assist. Its a huge error. Often government officials could care less, or they are incompetent.” &#13
You need to be the very first particular person to present your data, and it has to be new data, not previously disclosed. &#13
Do not go to the news media with your whistle blower details. Public revelation of a whistle blower’s info could destroy any prospect for a reward. &#13
Do not try to force a government contractor, or corporation to come clean to the government about their wrongdoing. The Corporate Whistle Blower Center says, “Fraud is so rampant among federal contractors, that any suggestion of exposure may possibly outcome in an immediate job termination, or harassment of the whistle blower. We say, come to us very first, tell us what sort of information you have, and if we think its enough, we will aid find the proper law firms, to help in advancing your info.”

Any variety of insider, or employee, who possesses important proof of their employer, or a government contractor fleecing the federal government is encouraged to make contact with to Corporate Whistle Blower Center anytime at 866-714-6466, or they can speak to the group by means of their web site at http://CorporateWhistleBlowerCenter.Com

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes New Pretrial Order in Federal Transvaginal Mesh Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May possibly 30, 2013

Thousands of vaginal mesh lawsuit claims continue to move forward in federal litigations now underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on May possibly 29th, parties in the litigations have reached an agreement regarding the delayed filing of claims and the application of the statute of limitations. According to the Order, the agreement will apply to 4 litigations underway in the Southern District of West Virginia: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Goods Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327). Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in all of these proceedings.

&#13

This Order will make certain that vaginal mesh lawsuits are filed in an effective manner in these 4 proceedings. We are pleased to see these situations progressing, as we continue to hear from ladies who allegedly suffered significant vaginal mesh complications following surgery to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firm is at present representing hundreds of girls in state and federal courts who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, pain, scarring, infection and other serious vaginal mesh complications.

&#13

Vaginal Mesh Complications&#13

Pelvic mesh devices employed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and pressure urinary incontinence have been the topic of a U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) security assessment because October 2008, when the agency warned that it had received more than 1,000 vaginal mesh complication reports for the duration of a 3-year period. In July 2011, the FDA changed its stance on the frequency of injuries associated with prolapse repair, stating it no longer regarded these complications to be rare. At that time, the agency revealed it had received far more than two,800 reports of vaginal mesh injuries because its 2008 communication.*

&#13

Court documents indicate that thousands of women have given that filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits, all of which allege the manufacturers of the devices have been negligent in designing the items, and failed to warn customers of their significant risks. Thousands of added transvaginal mesh claims involving goods marketed by Ethicon Inc. and C.R. Bard have been consolidated in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County, exactly where Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey, S.. Grand is serving as Co-Liaison Counsel. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten, and In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten) He also served on the trial team in the litigations initial Ethicon mesh trial, which concluded with an award of far more than $ 11 million, including punitive damages, to the Plaintiff. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-ten, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey).

&#13

Victims of alleged vaginal mesh complications could be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of info relating to transvaginal mesh lawsuits can be located at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To learn a lot more, please get in touch with 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/default.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by unsafe drugs, defective health-related devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Biomet Hip Lawsuits Move Forward, as Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Upcoming Case Management Conference in Federal Biomet Hip Replacement Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) May 26, 2013

The federal litigation established for Biomet hip lawsuits continues to move forward in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to the Courts website, the litigations next Case Management Conference has been scheduled for June 17th. All of the lawsuits pending in the Biomet hip replacement litigation allege the metal-on-metal design of the Biomet M2a Magnum hip can generate high levels of metal ions, leading to metallosis in the surrounding tissue and early failure of the device. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

Our Firm is already representing clients in the federal Biomet hip replacement litigation, and continues to receive inquiries from Biomet M2a hip recipients who have allegedly suffered serious and debilitating complications related to the metal-on-metal device. We are pleased to see this proceeding moving forward, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm continues to offer free Biomet hip lawsuit evaluations to individuals allegedly injured by the Biomet M2a hip.

Biomet Hip Lawsuits

Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacements are metal-on-metal hip implants, which consist of a ball and cup made from a chromium-cobalt alloy. As of March 2013, court documents indicated that more than 140 Biomet hip lawsuits were pending in the federal Biomet hip replacement litigation. All federally-filed Biomet hip lawsuits were ordered transferred to the Northern District of Indiana in October 2012, in anticipation of a large number of claims.

This past January, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned that metal debris shed as metal-on-metal hip components wear may accumulate to dangerous levels in the body. This occurrence can result in bone and/or soft tissue damage in the area surrounding the implant and joint, leading to adverse local tissue reactions, premature device failure, and even additional symptoms or illnesses elsewhere in the body. Among other things, the FDA cautioned doctors to consider metal ion testing if patients are experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. According to the January announcement, the FDA is considering implementing new regulations for metal-on-metal hip implants that would make the devices ineligible for 510(k) clearances, which allowed such implants to come to market without human clinical trials.*

Alleged victims of Biomet hip replacement problems, including metallosis, hip implant failure, and other serious complications may be entitled to compensation for their medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. A wealth of information about Biomet hip lawsuits is available at Bernstein Liebhards website. For additional information, please contact one of our attorneys today by calling 800-511-5092.

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex individual and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, including those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective medical devices and consumer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the top plaintiffs firms in the country, for the past 10 consecutive years.

Bernstein Liebhard LLP

10 East 40th Street

New York, New York 10016

800-511-5092

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.