Tag Archives: Federal

Surgical Mesh Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Current Creation of New Federal Vaginal Mesh Litigation in Southern District of West Virginia

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 26, 2013

Surgical mesh lawsuit claims are continuing to move forward in a number of federal litigations at present underway in the Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports.

&#13

According to court documents, a federal multi-district litigation for claims involving transvaginal mesh manufactured by Cook Healthcare, Inc. was authorized on June 11th by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The initial status conference for this proceeding has been scheduled for August 1st at 9:00 a.m.* (In Re: Cook Medical, Inc., Pelvic Repair Technique Goods Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2440)

&#13

Lawsuits alleging injuries brought on by the companys mesh are now pending in the federal proceeding underway in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, where claims involving merchandise from American Medical Systems, C.R. Bard, Boston Scientific and Johnson &amp Johnsons Ethicon unit have currently been filed in separate litigations. On the date the Cook Health-related litigation was approved, court records indicate there had been 13 instances filed against the manufacturer in eight federal jurisdictions in the U.S.

&#13

Given how numerous women we hear from who have sustained mesh erosion, vaginal scarring and other injuries allegedly due to transvaginal mesh merchandise, we are not surprised that far more of these varieties of products are becoming the object of litigation, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and medical devices. The Firm is actively filing transvaginal mesh lawsuits on behalf of women who allegedly suffered pain, vaginal scarring, mesh erosion, infection and other injuries.

&#13

Surgical Mesh Lawsuits

&#13

In addition to lawsuits now pending in the recently developed federal litigation involving Cook Health-related mesh devices, thousands of claims have been filed in the four other transvaginal mesh proceedings established in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. These lawsuits have been filed by women who allegedly seasoned complications stemming from mesh erosion by means of the vaginal tissue, which could manifest in infection, discomfort, vaginal scarring, and other injuries. As a result, plaintiffs in these circumstances allege they now endure a diminished quality of life.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees in the following four federal vaginal mesh litigations: In re: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Merchandise Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325) In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2326) In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2187) and In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation ( MDL No. 2327).

&#13

The scrutiny surrounding this class of devices has continued to mount given that 2008, when the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its initial public overall health alert warning the public that it had received far more than 1,000 adverse event reports from women implanted with the surgical material.** In 2011, the agency revised its stance on the frequency of these complications to occur from rare to not uncommon following finding that the number of complaints from vaginal mesh individuals improved 5-fold over a period of 3 years.***

&#13

Girls who could have been injured by transvaginal mesh may be eligible to get compensation for out-of-pocket medical costs, as well as lost wages, pain and suffering and other damages. Find out far more about surgical mesh lawsuits by going to Bernstein Liebhard LLP’s site. To speak with a mesh lawyer straight, call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*wvsd.uscourts.gov/MDL/2440/pdfs/PTO_1.pdf&#13

**fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm&#13

***fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Security/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated individual and class action lawsuits nationwide because 1993, including these who have been harmed by harmful drugs, defective healthcare devices and consumer items. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the prime plaintiffs firms in the country, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Marketing.

Federal Grants Specialist Bob Lloyd to Translate “Auditese” into Laymans Terms in July 9 Webinar

Posted on by

Washington, DC (PRWEB) June 27, 2013

Federal grant auditors usually speak in acronyms and terms that most individuals dont realize. In “Can You Speak ‘Auditese’? A Guide for Nonfinancial Personnel in Federally Funded Organizations,” an upcoming July 9 webinar sponsored by Federal Fund Management Advisor, federal grants professional Bob Lloyd will translate “auditese” into understandable laymans terms, providing nonfinancial personnel an overview of important auditing standards, objectives and procedures that are crucial in receiving an organization audit-prepared and to assist forge a a lot more powerful partnership among financial offices and the rest of the organization.

&#13

The subjects to be discussed include:&#13

&#13
The two prongs of federal audit policy: For federal and nonfederal audits&#13
Economic audit objectives: Accuracy, internal handle and compliance&#13
Efficiency audit objectives: Economy, efficiency and plan outcomes&#13
Audit requirements: What are they? Who concerns them? Why are they critical?&#13
Audit criteria: Laws and regulations, and accepted and ideal practices&#13
Audit method: All the events in the life of an audit&#13
Audit results: Opinions, reports, findings and recommendations&#13
Following the audit: How to use audits to improve administration and efficiency of federal grants and subgrants

Visit http://federalfundmanagement.com/webinars/wg316_070913 for more information and registration information.

&#13

Bob Lloyd is a respected authority on policies and practices affecting the award, administration and oversight of federal grants, contracts and subawards. Mr. Lloyd has far more than 40 years of knowledge in federal award implementation. Prior to starting his management consulting practice in Washington, D.C., in 1982, he served as the executive director of the Grants Management Advisory Service and held staff positions in two massive federally funded organizations. Considering that then, he has been a consultant, trainer or advisor to award and audit units in 16 federal award-producing departments and agencies, and to recipient and subrecipient organizations and their expert advisors positioned in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, several U.S. territories and 18 foreign countries. He is the principal author of many reference works on federal grants management and audits, and at present serves as contributing editor to Federal Grants News and Federal Auditing News, published jointly by Atlantic Data Services and NACUBO. He also is a Charter Life Member of the National Grants Management Association and served on its Board of Directors for five years.

&#13

Attendees of the Live Webinar can earn up to 1.5 CPE credits.

&#13

Federal Fund Management Advisor is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing expert education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of person courses for CPE credit. Complaints with regards to registered sponsors may possibly be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors by means of its website: http://www.learningmarket.org.

&#13

About Federal Fund Management Advisor

&#13

Federal Fund Management Advisor is an organization that sponsors Federal Funding webinars and delivers free of charge Federal Funding E-Techniques. Go to http://www.FederalFundManagement.com to study the most current E-Technique, “‘Man Bites Dog’: An Internal Control Lesson for Grantees.”

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Financial Aid Administrators Situation Updated 2013 National Profile of Federal Student Help Applications

Posted on by


Washington, DC (PRWEB) June 27, 2013

The National Association of Student Economic Help Administrators (NASFAA) released an updated edition of its annual federal student aid primer, the National Student Aid Profile, to better inform members of the media, policymakers and other interested parties about the facts surrounding student aid problems and funding.

&#13

“As the 2014 expiration of the Greater Education Act nears, conversations are increasingly centered around escalating federal student debt, higher default price levels, rising charges of attendance for postsecondary education, and the sustainability of federal funding sources for the student help programs,” stated NASFAA President Justin Draeger. “Members of Congress have been debating the greatest ways to reform and strengthen the federal help programs. It is essential that Congress and the basic public recognize these programs and the students they serve.”

&#13

U.S. Division of Education data show the number of students applying for federal monetary help rose from around 19.four million in the 2007-2008 award year to almost 31.four million in the 2011-2012 award year, a 62 percent improve more than five years.

&#13

From 2001-2002 to 2011-2012, the total quantity of federal monetary aid awarded to students beneath Title IV of the Greater Education Act (HEA) jumped from $ 72.three billion to an estimated $ 173.8 billion, a ten-year enhance of 140 %. For 2011-2012, the Title IV programs accounted for 71 percent of the $ 245 billion in total monetary help received by college students.

&#13

NASFAAs National Student Help Profile: Overview of 2013 Federal Applications gives the newest detailed data and information about every of the applications authorized beneath Title IV of the Greater Education Act, such as:

&#13

— descriptions of the federal student help applications, which includes the:&#13

Sensible Technologies Support Federal Agencies Save Power, Cut Fees

Posted on by

Washington, D.C. (PRWEB) June 27, 2013

Federal agencies could achieve considerable savings of energy and income via expanded use of data and communication technologies, according to a new report released nowadays by the Center for Climate and Power Solutions (C2ES).

&#13

If broadly deployed, information and communication technologies (ICT) could assist agencies meet half of their goals for cutting greenhouse gas emissions and could save far more than $ 5 billion in power expenses via 2020, C2ES estimated. These technologies consist of sophisticated power sensors and controls, GPS-primarily based fleet management systems, teleconferencing, and cloud-based information storage.

&#13

The new C2ES report, Top by Instance two.: How Info and Communication Technologies Support Attain Federal Sustainability Goals, documents how the adoption of these technologies is assisting federal agencies decrease expenses and emissions. It also recommends actions agencies can take to overcome barriers to their expanded use.

&#13

As President Obama emphasized in his new climate action program, the federal government has each the chance and responsibility to lead by instance in moving us in a much more sustainable path, said C2ES President Eileen Claussen. Smarter use of information and communication technologies is one particular very good way the nations largest landlord, fleet operator, and customer of goods and services can each shrink its carbon footprint and save taxpayers income.

&#13

Federal agencies have an overall purpose of decreasing their direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions 24 % beneath 2008 levels by 2020. Via 2011, the government had decreased total covered emissions virtually 7 percent, mainly via power efficiency and purchases of renewable energy.

&#13

Agencies could go significantly further by taking advantage of such ICT options as:&#13

Da Vinci Lawsuit News: Bernstein Liebhard LLP Notes Recent FDA Letter Stating Intuitive Surgical Could Have Violated Federal Regulations Regarding its da Vinci Robot

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) June 27, 2013

In a current notice from the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) that might impact da Vinci lawsuit claims, the agency states that Intuitive Surgical possibly violated federal law by failing to initial alert regulators when it warned consumers about difficulties with the da Vinci Surgical Program, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports.

&#13

According to the letter issued May 30th by the FDA, Intuitive Surgical received 134 complaints and filed 83 medical device reports stemming from use of the device between January 2010 and December 2011.* Following these reports, Intuitive sent a letter to buyers in October 2011 providing ideas and recommendations for appropriate use of the da Vinci Surgical Technique. According to a CNBC.com report published on June 25th, the FDA said Intuitive Surgical wrote to its customers in response to complaints concerning arcing by way of broken tip covers that caused patient injury.**

&#13

Intuitive Surgicals failure to very first notify the FDA begs the question of whether or not they were attempting to hide one thing from the regulator. We will be watching this improvement carefully. Our Firm continues to hear from individuals who allegedly skilled surgical burns, excessive bleeding and other critical undesirable robot surgery complications stemming from use of the da Vinci Surgical Technique, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is presently supplying totally free and confidential case evaluations to individuals who may have experienced robotic surgery complications after undergoing a procedure aided by the da Vinci Surgical System. Da Vinci Lawsuit Claims

&#13

According to a statement issued April 19th by Intuitive Surgical, 26 da Vinci lawsuits alleging complications due to the surgery robot had been filed in the U.S. Court records indicate that the nations very first trial for a claim alleging robotic surgery complications concluded with a ruling in favor of Intuitive last month, but a May possibly 23rd report from Bloomberg.com stated that the lawyer for the plaintiff in the case was optimistic that future lawsuits more than the da Vinci Surgery Robot would result in favorable outcomes for allegedly injured sufferers.***(Estate of Fred E. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, 09-two-03136-5, Superior Court, State of Washington, Kitsap County)

&#13

In a regulatory filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued by Intuitive on April 19th, the manufacturer reported that it had entered tolling agreements in specific bad robot surgery lawsuits more than its da Vinci Surgical System to allow additional time to evaluate the claims, to discover regardless of whether the claims have merit and whether they can be resolved without having litigation.**** As of March 14th, 2013, a notice entered in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana on March 14th indicated that Intuitive had settled a lawsuit alleging injuries sustained by a woman whose thyroid process was aided by the da Vinci robot. (Silvestrini v. Intuitive Surgical Systems Inc., No. 11-2704 (E.D. La.))

&#13

The da Vinci Surgical Method was authorized in 2000 to aid surgeons performing minimally-invasive laparoscopic, urologic and gynecologic procedures. The device is now also utilized in thousands of hysterectomies, gall bladder and prostate removal surgeries, thyroid cancer procedures and heart surgeries, according to a Bloomberg.com report from February 28th.*****

&#13

Individuals who knowledgeable robotic surgery complications may possibly be entitled to compensation for healthcare bills, lost wages, discomfort and suffering and other damages incurred by their injuries. Understand a lot more about bad robot surgery complications by visiting Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. To speak with one of the Firms attorneys, please call 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofGlobalRegulatoryOperationsandPolicy/ORA/ORAElectronicReadingRoom/UCM358468.pdf&#13

**cnbc.com/id/100843549&#13

***bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-23/intuitive-wins-trial-defeats-negligent-coaching-claims.html&#13

****sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1035267/000119312513162385/d508282d10q.htm &#13

*****bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-23/intuitive-wins-trial-defeats-negligent-education-claims.html

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes those who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective health-related devices and consumer goods. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the leading plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past 10 consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Biomet Hip Lawsuits Move Forward, As Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports on Latest Case Management Conference in Federal Biomet Hip Replacement Litigation

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Hundreds of Biomet hip lawsuits involving the Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Replacement Program continue to move forward in the federal multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana. According to a Memorandum issued by the Court on June 24th, the Biomet hip replacement litigations most recent case management conference was held on June 17, 2013, at which time a quantity of issues had been addressed, including pending motions to strike affirmative defenses, jurisdictional issues connected to the current dismissal of improperly named defendants, and the use of a kind complaint. At the conclusion of the conference, the parties presented a tutorial on the scientific and technical issues involved in the Biomet hip replacement lawsuits. (In re: Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Items Liability Litigation MDL No. 2391)

&#13

This most current conference addressed a number of crucial concerns. We are pleased to see the Biomet hip replacement litigation moving ahead, and look forward to extra progress in the future, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and healthcare devices. The Firm is representing customers in Biomet hip lawsuits in the federal multidistrict litigation, and continues to supply free of charge and confidential case evaluations to people who may possibly have been injured by Biomet M2a Magnum implants.

&#13

Biomet Hip Replacement Lawsuits&#13

Court documents indicate that far more than 300 Biomet hip lawsuits are now pending in the federal multidistrict litigation. All of the claims allege the Biomet M2a Magnum implants metal-on-metal design can shed dangerous amounts of toxic metal debris as a outcome of wear, top to metallosis and other adverse tissue reactions, as effectively as premature device failure. According to the June 17th Memorandum, the Biomet hip replacement litigations next case management conference has been scheduled for September 23, 2013, whilst a telephonic status conference is set for July 29, 2013.

&#13

The U.S. Meals &amp Drug Administration (FDA) has been reviewing the security of metal-on-metal hip implants like the Biomet M2a Magnum considering that February 2011. In January, the FDA warned that the metal debris shed from these devices can trigger damage to bone and/or tissue surrounding the implant and joint, top to discomfort, implant loosening, device failure, and the want for revision surgery to replace the device. At that time, the agency advised recipients of metal-on-metal hip replacements to undergo metal ion testing if they are experiencing symptoms of hip implant failure. The FDA also stated it had proposed a new rule that would make all-metal hips ineligible for 510(k) approvals, a process which allowed such devices to come to market place with out first undergoing human clinical trials.*

&#13

Alleged victims of metal-on-metal hip implant complications associated to the Biomet M2a Magnum hip could be entitled to compensation for their medical expenditures, lost wages and discomfort and suffering. To understand far more about the Biomet hip replacement litigation, please check out Bernstein Liebhard LLPs website. For further data about filing a Biomet hip lawsuit, please contact 1 our attorneys today at 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated individual and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective health-related devices and customer merchandise. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the leading plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

ten East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Advertising.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Federal Judge Overseeing American Healthcare Systems Surgical Mesh Lawsuits Selects Bellwether Instances, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 02, 2013

Transvaginal mesh lawsuit claims involving items manufactured by American Medical Systems, Inc. continue to move forward in a federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Pretrial Order issued by the Court on July 1, 2013, four surgical mesh lawsuits have been chosen for the litigations bellwether trials. The proceedings initial trial is scheduled to start on December 3, 2013, even though a second is slated to start off on Might six, 2014. U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin will soon establish which of the 4 bellwether instances will go to trial on those dates, according to the Order. (In Re: American Health-related Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Items Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2325)

&#13

We are incredibly pleased to see these claims moving forward. The bellwether trials will give important clues into how other juries may possibly weigh claims in similar surgical mesh lawsuits involving American Medical Systems, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. The Firms vaginal mesh lawyers are currently representing hundreds of girls who allegedly suffered mesh erosion, discomfort, scarring, infection and other serious injuries, allegedly due to transvaginal mesh merchandise marketed by American Health-related Systems and other manufacturers. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in the American Healthcare Systems litigation.

&#13

American Health-related Systems Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

&#13

Court documents indicate that a lot more than 7,700 surgical mesh lawsuits have been filed against American Healthcare Systems in the Southern District of West Virginia. All of the lawsuits pending in the litigation allege that American Healthcare Systems failed to provide adequate warnings with regards to the dangers linked with surgical mesh utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. It is additional alleged that plaintiffs suffered a range of serious complications due to the defective nature of these items, including chronic infections, organ harm, and mesh erosion and shrinkage.

&#13

The litigation surrounding transvaginal mesh devices utilized to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence has been expanding given that October 2008, when the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) warned the public that it had received a lot more than 1,000 reports of serious complications linked with vaginal mesh products over a 3 year period.* Less than 3 years later, in July 2011, the FDA warned that complaints related with transvaginal prolapse repair had grown 5-fold because the 2008 alert, and stated that it no longer regarded as these varieties of injuries to be uncommon.**

&#13

American Healthcare Systems is just 1 of many producers involved in litigations for surgical mesh lawsuits established in the Southern District of West Virginia. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is also serving on the Plaintiffs Steering Committees for proceedings involving Boston Scientific Corp., (MDL No. 2326) C.R. Bard, Inc., (MDL No. 2187), and In re: Ethicon, Inc. (MDL No. 2327). Court documents show that the very first of the litigations bellwether trials, involving a C.R. Bard product, is scheduled to start on July 8, 2013.

&#13

Mr. Grand has also been named Co-Liaison Counsel in two consolidated litigations established for C.R. Bard and Ethicon transvaginal mesh lawsuits that are at present underway in New Jerseys Atlantic County Superior Court. He was also a member of the trial group on the very first Ethicon trial in that proceeding, which ended in March with an $ 11 million verdict for the Plaintiff. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-ten In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-ten)

&#13

Ladies who have allegedly suffered severe complications related with transvaginal mesh may possibly be entitled to compensation for their healthcare bills, discomfort and suffering, and other injuries. A wealth of data with regards to transvaginal mesh lawsuits is obtainable at Bernstein Liebhard’s web site. To arrange for a free of charge legal consultation with an experienced mesh lawyer, please get in touch with the Firm these days by calling 800-511-5092.

&#13

*fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm079028.htm&#13

**fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Security/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm061976.htm

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complicated person and class action lawsuits nationwide given that 1993, such as these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective healthcare devices and customer products. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the best plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the previous ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Attorney Marketing.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Certifies That Braun Corporation Meets Get America Needs

Posted on by

(PRWEB) July 03, 2013

Braun Corporation is pleased to announce that right now it received Purchase America final assembly status from the Federal Transit Administration.

&#13

This is a landmark selection for all Americans with physical disabilities, said Braun President and CEO, Nick Gutwein. In January Braun petitioned the FTA to figure out if Brauns manufacturing activities qualify for final assembly as supplied for in the Buy America’ needs of 49 C.F.R. Section 661. That work culminated today in the FTAs choice to grant Braun such status.

&#13

The selection advantages individuals with physical disabilities who use public transportation. The announcement also impacts Braun, its almost 1000 workers and a nationwide network of dealers who work with state agencies that rely on government funds to buy their nationwide fleet of wheelchair accessible vehicles. The choice enables Braun to continue competing for state transit contracts with reliable and fuel effective automobiles that meet all federal security and emissions regulations.

&#13

We applaud the FTA for its commitment to U.S. companies and workers who construct the very best goods in the world in American towns like our personal, Winamac, Indiana, Gutwein mentioned. In the course of a time when Americans celebrate their independence, its gratifying to know that government and business can perform together to ensure the continuing mobility independence for people with disabilities.”

&#13

About BraunAbility

&#13

BraunAbility is the largest manufacturer of wheelchair accessible vans, ramps, and wheelchair lifts worldwide and enables folks with physical disabilities to regain mobility and lead active and independent lives. The Indiana-based organization was founded by Ralph Braun, who was diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy at a young age and unable to stroll by age 15. Ralph was motivated by his disability to invent the worlds very first electric scooter (the Tri-Wheeler) and wheelchair lift (the Lift-A-Way) in his parents garage. Word spread and demand for the item elevated, resulting in the birth of Save-A-Step Manufacturing, which ultimately became BraunAbility. The company delivers the most diverse line of car platforms in the industry. For more details, please pay a visit to http://www.braunability.com.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Uncover Much more Administrator Press Releases

DePuy Pinnacle Lawsuits Continue to Mount, as Federal Claims Exceed 4,400, Bernstein Liebhard LLP Reports

Posted on by


New York, NY (PRWEB) July 03, 2013

DePuy Pinnacle lawsuit claims involving an all-metal version of the DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Program continue to mount in the federal multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Bernstein Liebhard LLP reports. According to a Master Case List issued by the Court on July 1, 2013, 4,445 DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuits were pending in the proceeding as of June 30th. (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. Pinnacle Hip Implant Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2244 N.D. Texas)

&#13

Our Firm continues to receive inquiries from individuals who have suffered metallosis, premature device failure and other serious complications allegedly related with the metal-on-metal DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement. We anticipate that filings in this litigation will continue to increase in the coming months, says Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing the victims of defective drugs and health-related devices. Jeffrey S. Grand, a companion with Bernstein Liebhard LLP, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee for the federal litigation, while the Firms DePuy Pinnacle lawyers continue to offer you cost-free legal evaluations to alleged victims of severe complications connected with the all-metal DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Method.

&#13

DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Lawsuits&#13

All of the DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuits pending in the Northern District of Texas involve a version of the Pinnacle hip method that utilized the Ultamet liner. According to court documents, plaintiffs allege that they have suffered premature implant failure, metallosis and other serious complications due to the propensity of the device to shed dangerous amounts of metal ions into the tissue surrounding the implant, as effectively as the blood stream. The lawsuits further allege that the all-metal Pinnacle shares some of the same style flaws that prompted DePuy Orthopaedics to recall its ASR line of metal hip implants in 2010, and question no matter whether this version of Pinnacle program must have been recalled as properly.

&#13

Even though it does not seem that a DePuy Pinnacle recall is imminent, DePuy Orthopaedics did announce in May possibly that it would be ending sales of all-metal hips, which includes the metal-on-metal Pinnacle. While the firm did not cite the increasing number of DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuits as a contributing issue to this selection, it did note that demand for metal-on-metal hips has slipped in recent years. According to a May 17th report from The New York Occasions, DePuy also cited a proposed regulation from the U.S. Food &amp Drug Administration (FDA) that would demand the producers of metal-on-metal hips at the moment on the industry to conduct post-marketplace safety research in order to preserve promoting the goods.*

&#13

Victims of significant complications allegedly associated with the metal-on-metal DePuy Pinnacle hip implant may possibly be entitled to compensation for their healthcare care, discomfort and suffering, and other damages. Added details about filing a DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement lawsuit is offered at Bernstein Liebhards site. For a free, no obligation legal consultation with a DePuy Pinnacle lawyer, please call 800-511-5092 today.

&#13

*nytimes.com/2013/05/17/company/jj-is-phasing-out-metal-replacement-hips.html?ref=health&amp_r=

&#13

About Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP is a New York-primarily based law firm exclusively representing injured persons in complex person and class action lawsuits nationwide since 1993, which includes these who have been harmed by dangerous drugs, defective health-related devices and customer goods. The firm has been named by The National Law Journal to the Plaintiffs Hot List, recognizing the best plaintiffs firms in the nation, for the past ten consecutive years.

&#13

Bernstein Liebhard LLP &#13

10 East 40th Street &#13

New York, New York 10016 &#13

800-511-5092

&#13

Lawyer Advertising.