Tag Archives: Borrowers

Forensic Mortgage Auditors Expands Audit Focus to Incorporate “Choice Arms” and Reverse Mortgages. Serving Borrowers and Law Firms Nationwide

Posted on by

Miami, FL (PRWEB) December 14, 2009

The proportion of U.S. home owners who owe much more on their mortgages than the properties are worth has swelled to about 23%, threatening prospects for a sustained housing recovery. Practically ten.7 million households had adverse equity in their houses in the third quarter, according to 1st American CoreLogic, a genuine-estate information business primarily based in Santa Ana, Calif.

&#13

A lot more than 40% of borrowers who took out a mortgage in 2006 — when home costs peaked — are under water. Prices have dropped so considerably in some components of the U.S. that some borrowers who took out loans more than five years ago owe more than their home’s value.

&#13

These so-known as underwater mortgages pose a roadblock to a housing recovery because the properties are more probably to fall into bank foreclosure and get dumped into an currently saturated industry. Economists from J.P. Morgan Chase &amp Co. stated Monday they did not anticipate U.S. property rates to hit bottom until early 2011, citing the prospect of oversupply.

&#13

Property rates have fallen so far that 5.three million U.S. households are tied to mortgages that are at least 20% larger than their home’s worth, the Initial American report said. Far more than 520,000 of these borrowers have received a notice of default, according to 1st American.

&#13

Forensic Mortgage Auditors (“FMA”) is a business unit of Professional Witness Solutions, LLC. FMA by way of its staff of experienced mortgage specialists and its information evaluation division, can perform a forensic fact pattern evaluation on a mortgage transaction, moving from the initial application interview all the way through to the closing of the transaction. At every step of the procedure, FMA evaluates the transaction for full complaince with RESPA, TILA, FCRA, HOEPA, and other agency rules and regulations. Every instance of improper practice is identified and FMA will cite to the applicable regulation creating legal assessment less complicated for the borrower’s attorney.

&#13

Report turn-around occasions are rapid, and the reports are usually regarded to be litigation prepared. FMA’s work product can be combined with FRE Report VII qualified expert witness solutions available from FMA’s parent organization.

&#13

FMA provides solutions to Home Owners and Law Firms. If you are an lawyer, or if you or an individual you know is topic to a subprime mortgage, “Option Arm” , or a Reverse Mortgage exactly where concerns of suitability or compliance exist, speak to FMA at (877) 330-9111. Or go to their web internet site at http://www.expert-witness-solutions.com.

&#13

# # #

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Far more Loan Modification Services Press Releases

Brookstone Law, Pc: Obama Administrations Mortgage Deal Could Exclude Borrowers from Future Action Against Banks

Posted on by


Newport Beach, CA (Vocus/PRWEB) March 02, 2011

Recent media reports that the Obama administration is attempting to reach an agreement with banks more than mortgage-servicing breakdowns highlights the require for homeowners facing foreclosure to have legal counsel prior to any settlement, according to Vito Torchia, Jr. managing lawyer of Brookstone Law.

&#13

According to media reports, the Administration’s proposed settlement would require banks and loan servicers to bear the expense of write downs but provides banks the freedom to decide what these modifications will be. Those servicers would include mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as investors in loans that had been securitized by Wall Street firms. Settlement terms stay in improvement and regulators are seeking at up to 14 servicers that could be a celebration to the settlement.

&#13

Brookstone Law, Computer, has filed a mass joinder lawsuit against Bank of America, potentially the most significant and precedent setting legal action taken against lenders as a result of the national foreclosure crisis. The lawsuit alleges Bank of America (BOA) and its subsidiary Countrywide Financial Corporation (Countrywide) perpetrated a enormous fraud, also constituting unfair competitors upon borrowers that devastated the values of their residences, resulting in the loss of net worth, and that BOA and Countrywide intended to deprive many rights and treatments for the difficulties they caused the borrowers. The case is Wright et al. v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., case no.30-2011-00449059-CU-MT-CXC filed in Orange County Superior Court.

&#13

Now that the U.S. Government is discussing settlements that will defuse lawsuits against the banks that specifically challenge elements of mortgage securitization, the broken chain of title or MERS, principal reduction is the most critical aspect of any settlement, said Vito Torchia, Jr. Until banks and servicers totally embrace principal reductions, the thousands of homeowners who are underwater will continue to struggle and that will preserve the housing marketplace and our economy down for years.

&#13

According to media reports in the Wall Street Journal, Federal agencies have been scrutinizing the nation’s largest banks more than breakdowns in foreclosure procedures that erupted final fall and last week, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency raised issues more than inadequate staffing and weak controls over foreclosure processes. In 2008, BOA settled claims worth more than $ eight.six billion for loans allegedly involving predatory lending practices committed by Countrywide, which it acquired that year.

&#13

Any settlement could be amongst the biggest ever against the mortgage sector especially considering that some are pushing for banks to spend billions or fund a comparable quantity of loan workouts, stated Vito Torchia, Jr. If a single settlement can’t be reached, it is most likely various federal agencies will nonetheless seek smaller sized penalties through regular enforcement channels, so banks could face the prospect of lawsuits from state attorneys common, which indicates property owners require for professional legal counsel will be just as wonderful right after any settlement as it is now.

&#13

ABOUT BROOKSTONE LAW, Computer &#13

Headquartered in Newport Beach, Calif., and with offices in Los Angeles, Calif., and Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., Brookstone Law, Computer is a law firm comprised of attorneys with expertise and accomplishment in business, corporate and individual finance, employment, entertainment and media, art and museum, intellectual property and true estate law. The firm has a network of more than 40 affiliate attorneys nationwide and employs very trained specialists, paralegals, paraprofessionals and administrative staff dedicated to serving clients. For info, call (800) 946-8655 or go to Brookstone-Law.com (http://www.brookstone-law.com).

&#13

# # #

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Borrowers taking advantage of the temporary SBA 504 refinance program with Industrial Loan Direct advantage from better terms and reduced rates

Posted on by


Atlanta, GA (PRWEB) April 30, 2012

With the SBA 504 refinance program coming to an end on September 27, 2012, Commercial Loan Direct a business division of CLD Capital, one of the top online originators of commercial loans and apartment loans in the country is seeing more borrowers than ever taking advantage of the higher lending limits and take-out option of the SBA 504 loan program for owner-occupied properties.

Commercial Loan Direct, a business division of Atlantas CLD Capital, is making a call to borrowers with owner-occupied properties that would qualify for SBAs 504 program. They say that now is the time to take advantage of this program, especially for borrowers that have properties that are difficult to refinance through conventional means, before it ends this coming fall.

USES. Proceeds may be used for the refinance of existing commercial loans whose proceeds were used substantially (85%) to acquire fixed assets eligible for the SBA 504 program. In addition, loan proceeds may be used to pay Eligible Business Expenses such as maintenance of building (no expansion to building), equipment purchases, rent, utilities, inventory or other obligations. These expenses must be incurred but not paid prior to the date of the application or come due within 18 months of the date of the application. All proceeds must have been used for the benefit of the small business concern.

STRUCTURE AND BORROWER EQUITY.

50%, varies – Loan secured by a senior lien from a third-party lender for not less than the net 504 loan.

Up to 40% – SBA 504 Loan secured by a junior lien from CP/SBA.

Not <10% – Borrower equity in the existing real estate and/or cash injection as needed. Additionally, the Borrower may pledge equity in any other fixed assets that are acceptable to SBA as collateral.

The Third Party loan and the 504 loan combined may not be more than 90% of the fair market value of the fixed assets securing the loan. In no event may it exceed the outstanding principal balance of the debt refinanced, eligible business expenses & closing costs.

COLLATERAL. An independent appraisal supporting the fair market value of the fixed assets being refinanced and any other assets being offered as collateral whether commercial or residential must be submitted at SBA application. The appraisal(s) must be dated within six (6) months of the date of application.

FEES. The Borrower is required to pay an annual guarantee fee to cover the cost of the refinancing program in the amount of 1.043%.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.

Commercial Loans being refinanced must have been current for the past year according to the original or modified terms, with no payment being past due for more than 30 days. Any modification must have been entered into prior to issuance of SBA final rule on 10/12/11. A transcript must be provided to demonstrate compliance with this requirement. For the refinancing of same institution debt, the transcript of account for the entire period of the loan must be provided. This will be used to determine the overall creditworthiness of the Borrower.

No refinancing where the creditor on the debt to be refinanced is in a position to sustain a loss; causing a shift to SBA of all or a portion of a potential loss from an existing debt.

Debt being refinanced must have been incurred not less than two years prior to the date the application is received by SBA. Additionally, the small business concern must have been in business for two years prior to the submission of the application.

Debt may be refinanced even if it does not meet the job creation requirement or other public policy goals set forth by the SBA. In such case, the 504 loan size may not exceed the amount obtained by multiplying the number of full-time equivalent employees (40 hour work week) of the Borrower by $ 65,000.

Borrower must currently occupy 51% of the building being refinanced.

RESTRICTIONS.

No refinancing of loans with an existing federal guaranty; such as an SBA 7(a) or 504 loan or an USDA loan.

No refinancing of debt to an Associate of the Borrower, an SBIC, or New Market Ventures Capital Companies (NMVCC).

When the debt being refinanced is same institution debt, the Third Party Loan cannot be sold on the secondary market as part of a pool of guaranteed loans.

CLOSING.

All loans approved must be closed within 6-months. Loans will be canceled by SBA if not funded during this time period.

When loan being refinanced is Same Institution Debt, either an escrow account or an interim loan may be used. When loan being refinanced is not Same Institution Debt, an interim loan must be used.

Any delinquency on loans being refinanced after SBA approval but before the loan funding must be reported to the SBA as an adverse change.

Approved under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, the SBA 504 Temporary Refinance Program allows for the refinance of qualified debt under the SBA 504 Loan Program through September 27, 2012.

View CLD’s SBA Commercial Interest Rates







Find More Loan Modification Press Releases

Multi-celebration Suit Filed by Borrowers Against Aurora Bank et al

Posted on by


Roseville, California (PRWEB) November 11, 2011

On Tuesday October 25, 2011, United Foreclosure Lawyer Network (UFAN) filed suit in Superior Court in Sacramento (case # 34-2011-00112919) on behalf of borrowers allegedly injured by the lending practices of Aurora Bank and other people believed to have misled borrowers.

&#13

The complaint alleges that Aurora was one particular of the significant players in a scheme to make quickly, easy income at the expense of proper mortgage underwriting procedures. By packing subprime loans into mortgage backed securities that were sold to investors, a bank could recoup the funds lent quickly. The suit argues that this procedure encouraged lenders and mortgage brokers to aggressively push higher-expense subprime loans on any individual they could convince to sign on the dotted line.

&#13

According to court documents, plaintiffs argue that due to the fact of the sale of their loans, they did not obtain the benefit of the contract for which they bargained. Plaintiffs, believing they would be placed into a standard Lender/Borrower connection, later identified that they did not have a lender with whom they could deal. Servicers are restricted in producing alterations to contracts when situations are unforeseeably changed. Furthermore, loan servicers have an incentive to foreclose whereas a lender has the incentive to modify a loan if it would be much more profitable in the extended run. If numerous of the home owners had been still in the traditional lender/borrower relationship, they could have restructured the mortgage for a far more desirable result for both parties. In the present circumstance, the only entity profiting is the loan servicer. The complaint specifics how many Plaintiffs diligently sought modification of their loans but had been denied either because the servicer had no authority to grant a modification or since the servicer chose not to grant a modification.

UFAN: Massachusetts Lawyer General Suit Against the Main Banks Noticed as a Positive Sign for Beleaguered Borrowers

Posted on by


Roseville, California (PRWEB) December 16, 2011

In what came as a major improvement in the fight against mortgage fraud, on December 1, 2011, the Massachusetts Lawyer Common filed a suit against five of the major mortgage lenders, the LA Instances reports. The lawsuit alleges that Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo &amp Co., JPMorgan Chase &amp Co., Citigroup Inc. and GMAC Mortgage used fraudulent documentation in the foreclosure processes, took back properties without showing they owned the actual mortgages, and failed to uphold loan modification promises to borrowers in the state. The suit was filed in Superior Court in Suffolk County, case quantity 11-4363.

&#13

The case is a welcome improvement for borrowers, who have frequently bore the brunt of the effects of the mortgage crisis. Much media focus has been centered on lawsuits brought on behalf of investors injured by getting been sold toxic mortgage securities.

&#13

The United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is one firm currently standing up for borrower rights and has suits pending against some of the significant lenders. The Massachusetts case is a constructive development in raising the collective consciousness that borrowers had been usually as considerably victims of fraud as had been the purchasers of their loans, says Kristin Crone, managing attorney at UFAN. UFAN has suits pending against JP Morgan Chase and Aurora in California Superior Court, and against Bank of America and Wells Fargo in California Federal Court. UFAN’s cases are discussed at length on its media web page.

&#13

According to the LA Instances, the Massachusetts Attorney Common is open to settling the case so extended as the interests of Massachusetts borrowers are represented. The 50 state Attorneys General have been at one point on board with settlement negotiations that would see main banks spend a sum of funds in exchange for immunity for previous mortgage fraud, news sources recommend. Over the past year, even so, negotiations have stalled prompting specific Attorneys Common (like Kamala Harris of California) to withdraw from possible settlements. California Attorney General Kamala Harris concluded that what was getting provided by the banks was not good sufficient for residents of the state, media reports indicate.

&#13

In 2008, then California Lawyer General Jerry Brown sued Countrywide (Men and women of the State of California v. Countrywide Financial Corp., Los Angeles Superior Court, case # LC083076) over alleged deceptive marketing practices that took advantage of borrowers. The case settled a couple of months later and Countrywide was supposed to provide borrowers principal and interest price reductions, according to The Boston Globe. Jerry Brown named the settlement, the largest loan modification in history and it was intended to offer $ 3.4 billion in relief for California borrowers.

&#13

Despite high hopes at the time, that settlement has failed to acquire substantial relief for California homeowners, The New York Instances reports, and foreclosure prices continue to rise. Referring to the 2008 settlement, the spokesman for the present California Attorney Basic mentioned there is a substantial gap among the relief promised to property owners and what was actually delivered to them. And the mechanisms needed to hold the bank accountable just werent there.

&#13

Complementary consultations offered.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Lawyer NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Pc dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-primarily based law firm supplying mortgage litigation and other debt associated legal services. The committed attorneys and staff at UFAN operate tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its customers. For more details call toll free of charge 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release could constitute attorney advertisement. The information in this release and on the UFAN internet site (ufanlaw.com) is for general info purposes only. Nothing in this release or on the UFAN website must be taken as legal advice. Prior successes are no guarantee of future efficiency. Litigation is inherently uncertain and results in litigation are never ever assured.

&#13

# # #

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

UFAN Files New Lawsuit Against U.S. Bank on Behalf of Borrowers

Posted on by


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) January 26, 2012

On January 13, 2012 UFAN Legal Group, Computer filed suit against U.S. Bank in San Diego County Superior Court (case quantity 37-2012-00065195-CU-OR-EC) on behalf of borrowers allegedly injured by the Banks lending and servicing practices.

&#13

The complaint alleges that U.S. Bank schemed to profit from reckless and negligent lending practices that ensured borrowers would default on their mortgages. US Bank is alleged to have abandoned its personal underwriting standards in an effort to originate as several mortgages as possible for immediate sale on the secondary mortgage market. The complaint argues that since US Bank could immediately sell mortgages and get completely compensated, it incentivized fraud by loan officers and brokers by providing higher origination fees on subprime loans.

&#13

According to the complaint, Plaintiffs allege US Bank acted negligently in both the origination and modification of Plaintiffs loans. Plaintiffs argue that US Bank wore two hats 1 of a purported lender of money and a single as a developer and seller of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS). By taking on such a dual function, US Bank was no longer acting as a mere lender of cash, but rather acting as a middleman in marketing and advertising and selling loans. US Bank breached its duty by abandoning standard underwriting standards and encouraging the origination of predatory loans, the complaint alleges.

&#13

The complaint alleges that U.S. Bank used falsified borrower info like credit ratings and income, as effectively as inflated property appraisals, as component of the origination method. It is argued that US Bank incentivized property appraisers and loan originators to falsify this info in order to spot borrowers in bigger and more dangerous loans. The higher the loan quantity, the much more income U.S. bank was able to make on the sale of the RMBS to investors. The complaint suggests that Plaintiffs borrowed excessively in reliance on this falsified info and were harmed by the excessive debt burden.

&#13

Plaintiffs also allege negligence on the part of U.S. Bank associated to the servicing of Plaintiffs loans. Plaintiffs have been lured into a false sense of security by means of the modification procedure, and relied to their detriment on representations by U.S. Bank that a modification would be forthcoming. The complaint alleges that no modification was, in reality, intended and that Plaintiffs placed false hope and abandoned other legal rights in reliance on the modification procedure. In numerous circumstances, Plaintiffs had been induced to default on payments to qualify for modification. US Bank had an interest in foreclosing on Plaintiffs as it no longer held the threat of default and now receives charges for foreclosing.

&#13

Plaintiffs argue that US Bank was in a position to foresee this detrimental reliance and subsequent harm, and consequently breached its duty to Plaintiffs.

&#13

The complaint against U.S. Bank is the newest lawsuit filed by UFAN on behalf of borrowers alleged to have been injured by the lending and servicing practices of the major banks. Home owners believed to have been injured by way of the mortgage practices of US Bank or other individuals are urged to get in touch with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Lawyer NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Pc dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-primarily based law firm delivering mortgage litigation and other debt associated legal solutions. The devoted attorneys and employees at UFAN operate tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its consumers. For much more information get in touch with toll totally free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release could constitute attorney advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the attorney responsible for this advertisement. The data in this release and on the UFAN web site (ufanlaw.com) is for common data purposes only. Nothing at all in this release or on the UFAN website should be taken as legal suggestions. Prior successes are no assure of future functionality. Litigation is inherently uncertain and outcomes in litigation are never ever assured.

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Bankruptcy Reorganizations Increasingly Utilized by Industrial True Estate Loan Borrowers

Posted on by

(PRWEB) April 10, 2012

More than the previous couple of months, we have been seeing an improve in Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganizations as a tool utilized by commercial genuine estate borrowers in their negotiations with lenders, stated Kevin M. Levine, Executive Vice President of Peak Asset Solutions (http://www.peakassetsolutions.com). A lot more and a lot more loans financed on a short-term basis of five to 7 years are maturing, but lowered property values are a barrier to refinancing, he said. So if the borrower and lender can’t come to agreement and the lender is threatening foreclosure, the borrower may have no option but to seek bankruptcy court protection. The automatic stay resulting from the bankruptcy petition filing will buy time for the borrower to seek alternative investor financing.

&#13

Levine explained that if the lenders loan documents are legally sound, it may file a motion to lift the keep allowing it to proceed with the foreclosure. Even so, if the borrower can submit a feasible strategy to pay the lender in a reasonable time, the bankruptcy court could give it that chance. The speedy non-judicial foreclosure that the lender was contemplating will be delayed for at least some period of time, and the lender now is faced with further legal expense. These negative prospects may persuade the lender to become much more reasonable with regard to negotiating a restructure and extension of the loan.

&#13

Levine pointed out that there are a quantity of adverse elements to any commercial true estate bankruptcy reorganization. A Chapter 11 proceeding is a reasonably expensive additional burden for a borrower currently strapped for cash, and the filing and lawyer fees need to be paid up front, he mentioned. If there is a strong guarantor who has unconditionally agreed to repay the loan, the lender nonetheless will be free of charge to go following that guarantor. And the borrower may possibly not be able to submit a feasible reorganization program or find option financing in the course of the period in which the keep is in spot, so the time and funds spent will not have accomplished any permanent advantage, Levine added.

&#13

Peak Asset Options offers commercial loan modification and brief sale services in California and throughout the nation. The companys personnel bring substantial commercial genuine estate expertise to every assignment, which includes industry analysis, valuation, legal, and negotiation knowledge. Each and every borrowers special lending scenario is completely analyzed, and the borrower is assisted in preparing current operating reports and projections. Then, Peak Asset Solutions drafts and submits to the lender a loan modification proposal. That proposal may consist of a principal reduction, interest rate reduction, and waiver of penalty charges. In these situations where a loan modification will not operate to the mutual benefit of the borrower and lender, we will try to broker a quick sale of the commercial actual estate at a considerable discount from the loan balance, or will seek to negotiate a sale of the note to a third-celebration.

&#13

Peak Asset Options is 1 of the entities in the Peak Corporate Network headquartered in Woodland Hills, California. In addition to industrial loan modifications, the Peak Corporate Network entities provide mortgage lending, loan servicing, brief sale solutions, 1031 exchange services, escrow services, trustee work, foreclosure services, and actual estate sale brokerage solutions. These services are available primarily throughout the Western United States for each residential and commercial true estate properties and loans. For more info, go to http://www.peakcorp.com.

&#13

The Peak Corporate Network is a brand that represents a group of separate legal entities, every single providing its unique set of real estate solutions.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

True Estate Law Center Continues Borrowers’ Fight Against Robo-Filing Banks

Posted on by

Los Angeles, Calif. (PRWEB) Could 01, 2012

As more details of the mortgage meltdown are brought to light such as the robo-signing scandal and mortgage lenders fined by the government property owners seeking for possibilities other than foreclosure require somebody in their corner.

&#13

Banks have been slow to procedure, and often ignore, loan modifications requests made by struggling homeowners. Nevertheless, True Estate Law Center, Pc has successfully ensured banks respond and method restructured mortgage settlement requests, and adhere to federal laws and regulations. The law firm, headed by Chad Pratt, is at the forefront of advocating for residence owners who’ve been the victim of predatory bank loans.

&#13

True Estate Law Center is aggressive in its pursuit of holding lenders accountable for its consumers. It is at present moving against Countrywide Economic (which has because been purchased by Bank of America Corp.) in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of home owners who’ve retained its services. (Ramos v. Countrywide Financial, case quantity BC463386)

&#13

“We have been able to aid borrowers who believed foreclosure was imminent since of the improper actions of the banks,” Pratt said. “We’ve been able to end the nightmare of exploitive mortgage tactics of the banks for our customers, maintaining them in their homes.”

&#13

Ally Monetary Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase &amp Co. and Wells Fargo &amp Co. paid out billions to New York, Massachusetts, Florida, California and Delaware, while other states are pursuing their own settlements. Bank of America is also eliminating about $ 100,000 from the mortgages of California borrowers as component of its agreement.

&#13

The banks, which were involved in unqualified personnel authorizing foreclosures or “robo-filing,” are settling with states and people at a staggering rate, Pratt stated, since the banks had been careless and incorrect.

&#13

“These settlements to the folks banks have wronged and the states in which they’ve violated the law is a direct outcome of the lender negligence and misrepresentation that was indicative of the robo-filing scandal,” Pratt added. “We will continue to fight for what’s fair for homeowners and make certain the banks are held accountable.”

&#13

For far more details, or if you are a homeowner who feels you have been wronged by your lender, contact the Genuine Estate Law Center, Computer visit http://lenderlawlitigation.com e mail information(at)lenderlawlitigation(dot)com or get in touch with 866-946-5342. The firms also handles unlawful detainer defense, post foreclosures and all connected litigation.

&#13

&#13

About Genuine Estate Law Center, Pc:

&#13

True Estate Law Center Pc is a firm exclusively devoted to assisting home owners in their struggle against lenders. Our firm is situated in Pasadena, California. We have a assortment of options not only for property owners in distress but also for these who are upside down in “bad” loans due to lender liability.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Wells Fargo Borrowers in California Nonetheless in Require of Mortgage Relief Regardless of Current Lawyer Basic Settlement

Posted on by


Roseville, California (PRWEB) June 14, 2012

Though settlement was reached recently with the States Attorneys Common, UFAN Legal Group, Pc (UFAN) continues to see important interest in litigation against Wells Fargo and the other key banks participating in the settlement. Despite the settlement, numerous California property owners continue with no relief.

&#13

UFAN filed its initial complaint against Wells Fargo on September 1, 2011 in Sacramento Superior Court (case quantity 34-2011-00110146). The case targets alleged fraud in the origination of loans, Wells Fargos improper servicing of borrowers loans, and other claims mostly concerned with contract law.

&#13

The Judicial Counsel of California lately agreed to coordinate this case with yet another related case pending in Los Angeles (Mireles v. Wells Fargo, Case No. BC467652, filed August 16, 2011). All similarly situated Plaintiffs now bring claims collectively. Likely, there will be an chance to add more Plaintiffs with similar claims.

&#13

Recent news headlines feature a significant settlement in between the States Attorneys General and 4 major banks, such as Wells Fargo. While Wells Fargo, via this settlement, agreed to a big money payout both to participating states and particular groups of distressed borrowers, numerous borrowers continue to be left without having relief. For example, the settlement does not cover homeowners whose mortgages are owned by government sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to media reports. Reportedly, these loans make up more than 60% of California homeowners, and the settlement itself will only apply to about 250,000 California home owners.

&#13

Although the settlement precludes certain new actions by state officials against participating banks, it does not limit private lawsuits filed on behalf of home owners. UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed homeowners who have been injured by the poor enterprise practices of Wells Fargo, and who have been left with no assistance despite governmental efforts.

&#13

If you think you may have been injured by your lender, UFAN delivers complementary lawyer consultations to assist distressed property owners in assessing possible alternatives for relief like, but not restricted to, litigation and bankruptcy. Click right here to make contact with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Attorney NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Pc dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-primarily based law firm providing mortgage litigation and other debt related legal services. The committed attorneys and staff at UFAN operate tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its consumers. For more information call toll free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release may possibly constitute lawyer advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the attorney accountable for this advertisement. The information in this release and on the UFAN internet site (ufanlaw.com) is for basic details purposes only. Practically nothing in this release or on the UFAN web site ought to be taken as legal suggestions. Prior successes are no guarantee of future overall performance. Litigation is inherently uncertain and benefits in litigation are by no means assured.

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

JP Morgan Chase Borrowers in California Nonetheless in Want of Mortgage Relief Regardless of Current Lawyer General Settlement

Posted on by


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) June 18, 2012

Although settlement was reached recently with the States Attorneys Basic, UFAN Legal Group, Computer (UFAN) continues to see significant interest in litigation against Chase and the other key banks participating in the settlement. In spite of the settlement, numerous California property owners continue with no relief.

&#13

UFAN filed its 1st complaint against JP Morgan Chase on October 18, 2011 in Superior Court for Contra Costa County (case number C-11-02390). The case targets problems origination of loans, Chases alleged improper servicing of borrowers loans, and other claims mainly concerned with contract law. The case has been amended twice in the initial half of 2012. UFAN is at the moment looking for new consumers, similarly situated with current plaintiffs, who are left without relief.

&#13

Current news headlines discuss the settlement in between the States Attorneys General and five main banks, which includes JP Morgan Chase. Even though Chase, by means of this settlement, agreed to a large money payout each to participating states and specific groups of distressed borrowers, a lot of borrowers continue to be left with no relief. For instance, the settlement does not cover property owners whose mortgages are owned by government sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to a February 2012 LA Occasions report. Reportedly, these loans make up far more than 60% of California home owners, and the settlement itself will only apply to about 250,000 California homeowners.

&#13

Even though the settlement precludes certain new actions by state officials against participating banks, it does not limit private lawsuits filed on behalf of home owners. UFAN continues to fight for the rights of distressed homeowners who have been injured by the poor enterprise practices of JP Morgan Chase, and who have been left without having assistance despite governmental efforts.

&#13

If you think you may have been injured by your lender, UFAN delivers complementary lawyer consultations to assist distressed homeowners in assessing feasible choices for relief which includes, but not limited to, litigation and bankruptcy. Click right here to get in touch with UFAN.