United Law Group Files Suit Against Bank of America on Behalf of John Wright

Santa Clara, CA (Vocus) March 23, 2010

United Law Group filed a complaint (case number 1-ten-CV-166846) on March 18, 2010 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, against Bank of America and its subsidiary Countrywide Property Loans, Inc. for breaches of contractual obligations, violation of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts Section 205, emotional distress, and violation of California Organization and Professions Code Section 17200.

&#13

This case states that though John Wright qualified for a mortgage modification below the Federal Property Inexpensive Modification Program (HAMP), he was denied access to the government-sponsored strategy.

&#13

I met the qualifications for HAMP and with United Law Group assisting me did every little thing the bank asked, mentioned Mr. Wright.

&#13

Mr. Wright continued to make the necessary payments in a timely manner and referred to as Bank of America frequently to ensure the success of the procedure. Each time he was told not to be concerned.

&#13

At one particular point a bank representative told me that I had nothing to be concerned about since Id completed every thing appropriate, said Mr. Wright. I happy the monetary terms of the trial modification and submitted the essential documentation before the August two, 2009 deadline, but Bank of America nonetheless sent a Notice of Intent to Accelerate.

&#13

At the completion of the Trial Period Bank of America claimed it did not have the essential paperwork. In spite of numerous attempts by Mr. Wright to fax, re-fax and submit the documents by certified carrier, Mr. Wright received a letter on February 16, 2010 refusing his loan modification and demanding that he pay a lump sum payment or risk foreclosure proceedings.

&#13

John Wright and his economic scenario have been abused by the bank to the point exactly where litigation is his only recourse, stated Robert Buscho, Managing Lawyer for United Law Group. Sadly, his case is not distinctive. Millions of innocent, challenging operating citizens are getting misled and abused by the banks. Unless property owners take a stand this will not adjust.

&#13

United Law Group requires an aggressive stance against predatory lending practices and is an outspoken advocate on behalf of honest citizens who have been hurt by the housing and mortgage crisis.

&#13

We filed the case on behalf of Mr. Wright since the banks can not be permitted to continue to blatantly disregard this crisis, said Buscho. The United States government has asked banks to be a component of the remedy and has gone so far as to use taxpayer dollars as an incentive. We are merely carrying the torch lit by our officials to shed a light on and hopefully remediate predatory practices.

&#13

The banks use misinformation and misdirection till you cannot distinguish the very good guys from the poor guys. They make you afraid to get assist, mentioned Mr. Wright. Its ironic to me that United Law Groups reputation is in query proper now. Theyve been truthful with me throughout this ordeal and I count my blessings that I have United Law Group on my group.

&#13

The firm made the news recently when a group of officials entered their offices to evaluate the operate they are doing for their clientele.

&#13

Its been the banks that have mislead the public, mentioned Mr. Wright. United Law Group could have shut their doors and stopped helping folks after obtaining their practice was questioned, but they didnt. They were in the midst of preparing my case prior to it occurred and their attorneys filed my suit against Bank of America seven days later.

&#13

About United Law Group&#13

United Law Group represents shoppers in complicated litigation regarding abusive banking practices, breaches of contract and violations of state and federal laws. United Law Group also litigates cases involving bankruptcy, IRS settlements and debt settlements in state and federal courts across the nation. Employing a team of leading-notch attorneys, United Law Group leverages major-edge technologies to handle instances, support investigative efforts and guarantee correct, frequent communication with its clients. The firm is at present forming many class action lawsuits.

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Feldman Law Center Supports Lawyer General’s Efforts on Behalf of Home owners

Mission Viejo, CA (PRWEB) September 28, 2009

The Feldman Law Center, 1 of California’s premier loan modification law firms, has announced its assistance of California State Lawyer Common Jerry Brown’s intentions to defend home owners from underhanded loan modification businesses.

&#13

California loan modification attorney Steve Feldman, who heads the The Feldman Law Center, stated “Efforts to safeguard property owners from shady and even illegal loan modification organizations are essential. Whilst we may possibly haggle over the details, our California loan modification attorney group is as dedicated as the California Attorney General in protecting the public.”

&#13

Mr. Feldman went on to say, “The Feldman Law Center’s loan modification team has really gone out of its way to aid people who were previously taken advantage of by unethical loan modification firms. We feel a sense of duty to aid these homeowners who have been taken benefit of and have no location else to turn.”

&#13

The Feldman Law Center holds itself to the highest ethical standards, striving to supply property owners with efficient solutions to their foreclosure issues. Our attorneys are dedicated to assisting distressed home owners who have been taken advantage of by banks, mortgage servicers or by other loan modification businesses.

&#13

Loan modification organizations can take advantage of home owners in a numerous diverse methods:&#13

&#13

United Law Group to Litigate on Behalf of More than 40,000 Home owners Against Main Servicers and Lenders for Alleged Improprieties


Irvine, CA (Vocus) November 4, 2009

United Law Group announced the formation of Class Action lawsuits against Bank of America, Countrywide, Washington Mutual, JP Morgan Chase, Wachovia, Ocwen and several others. More than 40,000 defendants are involved in the suits, alleging unfair- and deceptive-practices.

&#13

(InsertImage}

&#13

In a recent post on MSN titled, Should You Sue Your Lender, Christopher Solomon of MSN True Estate writes, As America’s subprime lending mess evolves from a storm on the horizon to a real nationwide deluge, an increasing quantity of homeowners are turning to the courts for support with the loans they can not afford.

&#13

United Law Group is currently reviewing complaints from property owners. This national law firm has active lawsuits against Bank of America and its subsidiary Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (case number 30-2009 00121999) and JP Morgan Chase and its subsidiary Washington Mutual (case quantity 30-2009 00122403) for tortuous interference with contract, defamation (slander) and unfair business practices (pursuant to B&ampP Code

United Law Group Litigating on Behalf of Property owners Victimized By Lenders and Servicers Who Arent Honoring President Obamas Property Cost-effective Modification System (HAMP)

Irvine, CA (Vocus) December 9, 2009

United Law Group these days announced a plan to aid distressed existing and former homeowners by filing litigation and class action lawsuits against lenders and mortgage servicers. Any person that has been harmed by these firms can get in touch with the firm for a free consultation or to be entered into the class action suit for no charge.

&#13

United Law Group is at the moment reviewing complaints for circumstances against significant monetary institutions which includes Bank of America, Wachovia, Ocwen, JP Morgan Chase, Washington Mutual, and other people. This national law firm has active lawsuits against Bank of America and its subsidiary Countrywide Property Loans, Inc. (case quantity 30-2009 00121999) and JP Morgan Chase and its subsidiary Washington Mutual (case number 30-2009 00122403) for tortuous interference with contract, defamation (slander) and unfair enterprise practices (pursuant to B&ampP Code

United Law Group Sends Notice of Intent to Sue on Behalf of Disabled Man and His Wife Couple to Save over $600 on Their Monthly Payment

IRVINE, California (Vocus) February 16, 2010

United Law Group continues to service existing clients by litigating on their behalf. Nowadays the firm announced that Mr. and Mrs. Matt Williams of Citrus Heights, CA were presented a trial loan modification.

&#13

“The trial supply from the bank came right after we notified the lender of our intent to file suit in the Placer County Superior Court, said United Law Group Managing Director Robert Buscho.

&#13

This modification, which came nine months soon after the initial request for legal help, cut $ 600 off their month-to-month mortgage payment. Now the household can remain in their residence and continue to offer you emergency foster care to young children ranging in age from birth to 15 years old.

&#13

Although the Williams property appraised for more than $ 455,000 at the time of purchase, the familys 2,000 square foot residence is now valued at around $ 320,000.

&#13

I went by way of the loan modification approach on my personal through Washington Mutual, mentioned Matt Williams. The procedure was challenging and the outcomes had a minimal impact on my payment. Getting legal representation from United Law Group produced a considerable distinction. Im seeking at a remarkably greater outcome thanks to United Law Group’s litigation efforts.

&#13

Unable to work outdoors the home, Mr. Williams is on disability for a legally broken neck and herniated disks in his cervical spine. His wife, a dental hygienist, was laid off in January 2009. This placed a tremendous financial burden on their family.

&#13

We had been afraid of what this could imply to our family members, said Mr. Williams. We have two young young children of our own and do our part to help children in our community by taking in foster young children when the need to have arises. We didnt want to shed our property.

&#13

Struggling to meet their monetary obligations, the couple asked United Law Group for legal assist with their lender JP Morgan Chase in April of 2009. The firm worked diligently, pursuing all legal channels. In July of 2009 Mrs. Williams got a job as the manager of a dental workplace, which helped their financial predicament.

&#13

Ten months later, following the threat of a lawsuit, the bank extended the offer you of a trial modification to the loved ones, mentioned Buscho. We are cautiously optimistic with Chases provide of a trial modification. But our efforts will not end till this homeowner and other folks like them secure permanent relief.”

&#13

United Law Group was one particular of the very first law firms to advocate on behalf of households victimized by banks for the duration of this economic crisis.

&#13

“We’ve observed the discomfort that these people are in and are committed to assisting individuals to locate actual, permanent options to their financial troubles,” stated Buscho. “We stand by our clientele, each old and new, no matter whether that implies litigating on behalf of individuals or filing class action lawsuits against lenders and servicers who violate the laws place in location to safeguard the citizens of this country.”

&#13

United Law Group supports President Barack Obama’s efforts to encourage banks to do the correct factor. Recently President Obama and the government took the banks to job for their lack of functionality. An write-up titled, Obama Sends SWAT Teams Into Mortgage Servicing Offices that ran on December 1, 2009, stated that, The White Home threatened to punish mortgage lenders with fines if they dont speed up providing troubled homeowners a permanent break on their monthly payments.

&#13

The write-up continued stating that nearly 375,000 borrowers had received a trial modification and had been eligible for a permanent loan modification as of the end of December 2009. Even so only 1,711 permanent mortgage modifications had been supplied nationwide.

&#13

“We’ve noticed a wave of trial delivers with no comply with via, stated Buscho. “According to the statistics, a mere .4% of the trial offers became permanent. In numerous situations the banks are getting three months of payments from homeowners, then supplying permanent terms that are nothing at all like the trial supply. Had been monitoring the scenario very carefully to see if the banks carry out and disclose correctly. If the trial gives are practically nothing more than a bait and switch tactic designed to get an additional three month’s payments from individuals that are already hurting, United Law Group will step up to assist the individuals.”

&#13

United Law Group also represents customers in instances involving debt settlement, IRS settlement, auto loan payment relief, breaches of contract and violations of state and federal laws. They have a number of class action lawsuits pending against key lenders.

&#13

About United Law Group&#13

United Law Group is a national law firm with offices in California, New York and Florida. The firm represents shoppers in complicated litigation regarding abusive banking practices, breaches of contract and violations of state and federal laws. United Law Group also litigates instances involving bankruptcy, IRS settlements and debt settlements in state and federal courts across the nation. Employing a group of prime-notch attorneys, United Law Group leverages top-edge technology to handle situations, help investigative efforts and guarantee accurate, frequent communication with its clients. The firm is forming class action lawsuits in cases exactly where order to offer the greatest legal counsel to individuals who may well not be able to resolve their troubles with out representation.

&#13

For additional info on United Law Group, pay a visit to: http://www.UnitedLawGroup.com or contact United Law Group at (800) 680-5717.

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13

Associated Loan Modification Services Press Releases

UFAN Files New Lawsuit Against U.S. Bank on Behalf of Borrowers


Roseville, CA (PRWEB) January 26, 2012

On January 13, 2012 UFAN Legal Group, Computer filed suit against U.S. Bank in San Diego County Superior Court (case quantity 37-2012-00065195-CU-OR-EC) on behalf of borrowers allegedly injured by the Banks lending and servicing practices.

&#13

The complaint alleges that U.S. Bank schemed to profit from reckless and negligent lending practices that ensured borrowers would default on their mortgages. US Bank is alleged to have abandoned its personal underwriting standards in an effort to originate as several mortgages as possible for immediate sale on the secondary mortgage market. The complaint argues that since US Bank could immediately sell mortgages and get completely compensated, it incentivized fraud by loan officers and brokers by providing higher origination fees on subprime loans.

&#13

According to the complaint, Plaintiffs allege US Bank acted negligently in both the origination and modification of Plaintiffs loans. Plaintiffs argue that US Bank wore two hats 1 of a purported lender of money and a single as a developer and seller of residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS). By taking on such a dual function, US Bank was no longer acting as a mere lender of cash, but rather acting as a middleman in marketing and advertising and selling loans. US Bank breached its duty by abandoning standard underwriting standards and encouraging the origination of predatory loans, the complaint alleges.

&#13

The complaint alleges that U.S. Bank used falsified borrower info like credit ratings and income, as effectively as inflated property appraisals, as component of the origination method. It is argued that US Bank incentivized property appraisers and loan originators to falsify this info in order to spot borrowers in bigger and more dangerous loans. The higher the loan quantity, the much more income U.S. bank was able to make on the sale of the RMBS to investors. The complaint suggests that Plaintiffs borrowed excessively in reliance on this falsified info and were harmed by the excessive debt burden.

&#13

Plaintiffs also allege negligence on the part of U.S. Bank associated to the servicing of Plaintiffs loans. Plaintiffs have been lured into a false sense of security by means of the modification procedure, and relied to their detriment on representations by U.S. Bank that a modification would be forthcoming. The complaint alleges that no modification was, in reality, intended and that Plaintiffs placed false hope and abandoned other legal rights in reliance on the modification procedure. In numerous circumstances, Plaintiffs had been induced to default on payments to qualify for modification. US Bank had an interest in foreclosing on Plaintiffs as it no longer held the threat of default and now receives charges for foreclosing.

&#13

Plaintiffs argue that US Bank was in a position to foresee this detrimental reliance and subsequent harm, and consequently breached its duty to Plaintiffs.

&#13

The complaint against U.S. Bank is the newest lawsuit filed by UFAN on behalf of borrowers alleged to have been injured by the lending and servicing practices of the major banks. Home owners believed to have been injured by way of the mortgage practices of US Bank or other individuals are urged to get in touch with UFAN.

&#13

ABOUT THE UNITED FORECLOSURE Lawyer NETWORK

&#13

UFAN Legal Group, Pc dba United Foreclosure Attorney Network (UFAN) is a Roseville, California-primarily based law firm delivering mortgage litigation and other debt associated legal solutions. The devoted attorneys and employees at UFAN operate tirelessly to seek justice and fight for the rights of its consumers. For much more information get in touch with toll totally free 1-866-400-4242.

&#13

This release could constitute attorney advertisement. Kristin Crone, Esq. is the attorney responsible for this advertisement. The data in this release and on the UFAN web site (ufanlaw.com) is for common data purposes only. Nothing at all in this release or on the UFAN website should be taken as legal suggestions. Prior successes are no assure of future functionality. Litigation is inherently uncertain and outcomes in litigation are never ever assured.

&#13

###

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13