Tag Archives: Alleges

Transvaginal Mesh Merchandise Brought on Extreme Injuries in Texas Lady, Alleges Lawsuit Filed by Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) July 01, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm devoted to safeguarding the rights of victims injured by dangerous drugs and medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Texas woman who alleges that she was injured by transvaginal mesh items. The suit was filed on June ten, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia (Case No. 2:13-cv-11164) in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) entitled In Re: Coloplast Corp., Pelvic Support System Merchandise Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2387). Mentor Worldwide LLC, Coloplast Corp., Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson &amp Johnson and C.R. Bard, Inc. have been named as Defendants.

&#13

According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff was implanted with the Novasilk-Synthetic Flat Mesh in May 2011, the Alyte Y-Mesh in October 2012 and the TVT Exact in October 2012. These devices have been implanted to treat the Plaintiffs pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The lawsuit alleges that these devices are defective and brought on critical and possibly permanent injuries. Moreover, the Defendants allegedly knew about these defects but did not warn consumers in order to protect their own financial interests. The Plaintiff is suing for discomfort and suffering, emotional distress, and economic loss, and is seeking compensation for punitive damages.

&#13

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports that the most typical complications connected with transvaginal mesh may possibly include:

Diabetes Drug Actos Caused Bladder Cancer and Wrongful Death of Oklahoma Man, Alleges Lawsuit Filed by Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 25, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of victims injured by defective drugs, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of an Oklahoma man who developed bladder cancer and subsequently died, allegedly after taking the diabetes drug Actos (pioglitazone). The suit was filed on Might 23, 2013, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (Case No. 6:13-cv-1237). It is one of thousands of circumstances that have been filed as component of the multidistrict litigation (MDL) entitled In Re: Actos (pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation (six:11-md-2299). Takeda Pharmaceuticals, America Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. f/k/a Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. Takeda Pharmaceutical Firm Limited and Eli Lilly and Company have been named as Defendants. Jerrold S. Parker, founding partner of Parker Waichman LLP, serves on the Plaintiffs Steering Committee in the litigation.

&#13

According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff began taking Actos to treat his Variety 2 diabetes in November 2008. In January 2010, he was diagnosed with bladder cancer. He died in October 2012, allegedly due to the fact of Actos side effects. The lawsuit filed on his behalf alleges that the Defendants knew about the threat of bladder cancer but did not disclose this details to customers in order to protect economic interests. The Plaintiff alleges that Actos triggered pain and suffering, emotional distress and substantially decreased the Plaintiffs capability to take pleasure in life. The suit is also seeking damages for loss of consortium on behalf of the Plaintiffs spouse.

&#13

On June 15, 2011, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) warned that taking Actos for far more than a year could considerably increase the risk of bladder cancer. The safety label on Actos was updated to address this threat.

&#13

Some analysis research assistance the notion of a hyperlink amongst Actos and bladder cancer. The British Medical Journal published a study on Might 31, 2012, that revealed Actos customers were twice as probably to create bladder cancer right after two years. Then, on July three, 2012, the Canadian Health-related Association Journal reported that sufferers taking the medication have been 22 % much more likely to get bladder cancer.

&#13

Parker Waichman LLP continues to offer cost-free legal consultations to victims of Actos injuries, including bladder cancer, heart problems, and eye injuries. If you or a loved a single have been diagnosed with bladder cancer after taking Actos, please contact their workplace by going to yourlawyer.com. Free of charge case evaluations are also accessible by calling 1-800-LAW-Info (1-800-529-4636).

&#13

Get in touch with: &#13

Parker Waichman LLP &#13

Gary Falkowitz, Managing Lawyer &#13

(800) LAW-Info &#13

(800) 529-4636 &#13

http://www.yourlawyer.com

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

The Law Offices of Kramer and Kaslow: Justice Division Alleges Massive Banks Violated Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

Posted on by


Calabasas, CA (PRWEB) June 14, 2011

Philip Kramer, lead lawyer for the Law Offices of Kramer and Kaslow is sharing his thoughts on the recent settlement between the Justice Division and two of the nation’s largest banks. The New York Instances reports on a settlement agreement in between the Justice Department and two banks accused of violating the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, a federal law that extends an array of monetary and legal protections to military personnel.

&#13

According to the New York Instances, The Justice Department announced on Thursday that it had simultaneously filed and settled lawsuits against the two firms a subsidiary of Bank of America formerly recognized as Countrywide Property Loans Servicing, and Saxon Mortgage Services, a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley.

&#13

The New York Instances goes on to report, The organizations have been accused of knowingly and repeatedly violating the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, a federal law that extends an array of financial and legal protections to military personnel. Particularly, the organizations had been accused of ignoring a provision of the law that necessary them to get court orders before foreclosing on active-duty service members.

&#13

Countrywide Home Loans failed to protect and respect the rights of our servicemembers, failed to comply with clearly mandated procedures and foreclosed against property owners who are valiantly serving our nation, Andr

Woman with Bilateral DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implant Alleges Metal Hips are Flawed in Lawsuit Filed by Parker Waichman LLP

Posted on by


New York, New York (PRWEB) June 05, 2013

Parker Waichman LLP, a national law firm dedicated to guarding the rights of victims injured by defective medical devices, has filed a lawsuit on behalf of a lady implanted with two DePuy Pinnacle hips. The lawsuit was filed on March 25th in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Case No. 3:13-cv-01247-K) as portion of the DePuy Pinnacle multidistrict litigation (MDL No. three:11-md-02244). DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson &amp Johnson are the Defendants.

&#13

According to the Complaint, the Plaintiff was implanted with a Pinnacle hip on her left side in January 2007, and then had another Pinnacle hip implanted on her correct side in December 2008. The lawsuit alleges that the implants caused complications, which includes extreme pain, weakness and elevated chromium and cobalt levels in the womans bloodstream. The symptoms have been stated to have grown so severe that she needed to undergo a revision surgery to correct the troubles. Allegedly, the Defendants had been conscious of the potential for these dangers but failed to disclose them to the Plaintiff, her doctor or the public. The Plaintiff is suing for, amongst other factors, pain and suffering, emotional distress and financial loss due to lost wages and healthcare costs.

&#13

The lawsuit alleges that the Pinnacle is flawed simply because the metal-on-metal design causes the shedding of chromium and cobalt particles, which are then released into the physique. On January 17 of this year, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Security Alert that acknowledged these dangers, issuing new suggestions for all-metal hip individuals. The agency advised that those with implants undergo physical exams, diagnostics imaging and metal-ion testing when necessary. In that very same alert, the FDA also proposed new, stricter suggestions that would call for makers to prove that their devices are safe and successful by means of clinical testing this strategy is referred to as premarket approval. The existing approval route, recognized as the 510(k), only calls for device makers to show that their product is comparable to a previously approved device already on the marketplace.

&#13

Parker Waichman LLP continues to offer you totally free legal consultations to victims of DePuy Pinnacle and other metal-on-metal hip implant injuries. If you or a loved a single have seasoned premature failure of your implant, or other overall health troubles related with the Pinnacle or other metal-on-metal hip replacement device, please get in touch with their office by visiting the firm’s DePuy Pinnacle hip implant lawsuits web page at yourlawyer.com. Cost-free case evaluations are also available by calling 1 800 LAW Information (1-800-529-4636).

&#13

Get in touch with: &#13

Parker Waichman LLP &#13

Gary Falkowitz, Managing Lawyer &#13

(800) LAW-Information &#13

(800) 529-4636 &#13

http://www.yourlawyer.com

&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13
&#13

Find A lot more Administrator Press Releases